[Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Reviewer: Joseph Salowey Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and

[Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12

Reviewer: Rich Salz Review result: Ready I am the SECDIR reviewer for this document; the security directorate tries to review all documents before they go to the IESG. This content is intended primarily for the SecAD's, anyone else should consider this like other last-call comments. This

Re: [Lsr] Congestion (flow) control thoughts.

Hi Xuesong, > In congestion control of layer 4, it is assumed that there is a bottleneck in > the network, and the ideal rate of the transmitters equals to a fair share of > the bandwidth in the bottleneck. The flows in the network change all the time > and so as to the ideal transmitting

[Lsr] SRLG usage in the IGP Flexible Algorithm draft

Hi all, I have a question about the proposed usage of SRLG in the IGP Flexible Algorithm draft. This usage is defined Section 12 of the draft with the reference to the SRLG exclude rule as following: 2. Check if any exclude SRLG

[Lsr] Why only a congestion-avoidance algorithm on the sender isn't enough

Hello all, Two years ago, Gunter Van de Velde and myself published this draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hsmit-lsr-isis-flooding-over-tcp-00 That started this discussion about flow/congestion control and ISIS flooding. My thoughts were that once we start implementing new algorithms