Henk -
Thanx for your thoughtful posts.
I have read your later posts on this thread as well - but decided to reply to
this one.
Top posting for better readability.
There is broad agreement that faster flooding is desirable.
There are now two proposals as to how to address the issue - neither of
Reviewer: Scott Bradner
Review result: Ready
This is an OPS-DIR review of Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy
Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS
This ID proposes extensions to IS-IS to permit an egress LSR in a MPLS network
to signal ingress LSRs in the network that it can process the
> On May 4, 2020, at 5:47 AM, Henk Smit wrote:
>
> I'm looking forward to seeing (an outline of) your algorithm.
I'm not trying to push any particular algorithm, we already have some
proposals. My intention was only to suggest that we not disregard solutions too
aggressively. The argument
Mitchel wrote:
IS-IS has two levels of neighbors via hello level 1s (LSAs) and hello
level 2s :, so immediate is somewhat relative..
As Tony said, Level-2 neighbors are still directly adjacent.
There might be layer-2 switches between them.
But there are never layer-3 routers between 2
Peter.
Again lot of thanks.
Regards,
Sasha
Office: +972-39266302
Cell: +972-549266302
Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter Psenak
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 11:06 AM
To: Alexander Vainshtein ;
shrad...@juniper.net; cfils...@cisco.com;
On Friday I wrote:
I still think we'll end up re-implementing a new (and weaker) TCP.
Christian Hopps wrote 2020-05-04 01:27:
Let's not be too cynical at the start though! :)
I wasn't trying to be cynical.
Let me explain my line of reasoning two years ago.
When reading about the
Hi Sasha,
On 03/05/2020 09:46, Alexander Vainshtein wrote:
Peter,
Lots of thanks for a prompt response.
My reading of your response is as following:
There are two different ways in which SRLG information can be used with
Flexible Algorithms:
1.In a context of a single Flexible Algorithm,
Inline…
Mitchell Erblich
Implementation of IS-IS for Extreme Networks in what seems Eons ago…
erbli...@earthlink.net
> On May 3, 2020, at 11:12 PM, tony...@tony.li wrote:
>
>
> Mitchell,
>
>> I think we/you are looking at two different problems:
>> 1) a hop count of 1
Mitchell,
> I think we/you are looking at two different problems:
> 1) a hop count of 1 or maybe two between the two end points 2) and the
> multiple / many hop count between the two end points.
IS-IS adjacencies are always between immediate L3 neighbors, ignoring
