Just for the record, I’m ok with the latest text.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On May 26, 2020 at 10:25:38 AM, Peter Psenak (ppse...@cisco.com) wrote:
Hi Acee,
updated the text based on your comments.
thanks,
Peter
On 26/05/2020 16:07, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> This is in response to
Hi Peter,
Thanks - hopefully this will more than satisfy Ben's discuss.
Acee
On 5/26/20, 10:25 AM, "Peter Psenak" wrote:
Hi Acee,
updated the text based on your comments.
thanks,
Peter
On 26/05/2020 16:07, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> This is
Hi Acee,
updated the text based on your comments.
thanks,
Peter
On 26/05/2020 16:07, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Peter,
This is in response to the previous Email on your suggested text.
On 5/26/20, 4:26 AM, "Peter Psenak" wrote:
Hi Alvaro,
please see inline (##PP)
On
Hi Peter,
On 5/26/20, 8:22 AM, "Peter Psenak" wrote:
Hi Acee,
have you looked at the texts that I suggested in my response to Alvaro
earlier today?
I found it - let me reply to that Email.
Thanks,
Acee
Please see inline:
On 26/05/2020 13:49, Acee Lindem (acee)
I support the adoption.
Thanks
Mehmet
*From:* Lsr *On Behalf Of *Acee Lindem (acee)
*Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2020 3:40 PM
*To:* lsr@ietf.org
*Subject:*
This begins a 3 week (due to holidays) WG adoption call for the “Flooding
Topology Computation Algorithm” draft. Please issue your support
Hi Acee,
have you looked at the texts that I suggested in my response to Alvaro
earlier today?
Please see inline:
On 26/05/2020 13:49, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Alvaro,
See inline.
On 5/22/20, 10:59 AM, "Alvaro Retana" wrote:
On May 21, 2020 at 3:39:03 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Hi Alvaro,
See inline.
On 5/22/20, 10:59 AM, "Alvaro Retana" wrote:
On May 21, 2020 at 3:39:03 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
> With respect to Alvaro's clarification, your answer for (1) makes sense;
> thanks! I think Alvaro has offered to help work out what
Hi Alvaro,
please see inline (##PP)
On 22/05/2020 16:59, Alvaro Retana wrote:
On May 21, 2020 at 3:39:03 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
With respect to Alvaro's clarification, your answer for (1) makes sense;
thanks! I think Alvaro has offered to help work out what (if any)
