A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Acee Lindem, a Chair
of the lsr working group.
-
Working Group Name: Link State Routing
Area Name: Routing Area
Session Requester: Acee Lindem
Number of Sessions: 1
Length of
Russ -
I think you have too many email addresses.
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: op...@riw.us
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2021 10:01 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; 7ri...@gmail.com;
> 'Shraddha Hegde' ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] New Version Notification for
> [Les:] Signaling is required in your solution to indicate whether the neighbor
> should/should not propagate the LSP(s) received from a given neighbor.
> But Circuit Scoped LSPs as defined in RFC 7356 do not provide this
> functionality.
>
> A Circuit Scoped LSP is to be used to send
Speaking as document shepherd:
Hi Tom, Chris,
I agree that the example prefix should match the module prefix. Given that
ietf-isis-reverse-metric is a module specifically for this functionality and
not a general building block, I'm less concerned about the length of the
prefix. If it were a
From: Lsr on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: 18 December 2020 18:43
I still have an issue with the prefix in -02
The examples use rm: which I find a bit short.
The module should be the same but uses isis-rmetric: which I find a bit long.
isis-rm: would suit me
Tom Petch
A New
