Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1-03

2021-01-22 Thread Jeff Tantsura
support adoption. Cheers, Jeff On Jan 5, 2021, 1:20 AM -0800, Christian Hopps , wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1/ > > Please indicate your support or objection by January 19th,

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1-03

2021-01-22 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Support. These additional aspects of the protocol certainly need to be included in the model. Les > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2021 1:20 AM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps > Subject: [Lsr]

[Lsr] More responses required [Re: WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1-03]

2021-01-22 Thread Christian Hopps
Hi Folks, so far we've received only a single feedback on adopting this document, can we get a few more responses form the WG? Thanks, Chris. > On Jan 5, 2021, at 4:19 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > Signed PGP part > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > >

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1-03

2021-01-22 Thread tom petch
From: Yingzhen Qu Sent: 21 January 2021 17:28 Hi Tom, We published the new version a while back, so just wondering whether you got a chance to review the changes? Please kindly let us know if you have other comments. Yes, I did see and look at it. I would say that it addresses the points