Hi Warren,
Thanks for your review and please check inline below. Will look forward to your
inputs on how best to incorporate them in the draft.
-Original Message-
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker
Sent: 31 March 2021 00:53
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-origina...@ietf.
Alvaro/Peter -
In regards to:
> ...
> > 906 12.5. Sub-Sub-TLVs for SID Sub-TLVs
> >
> > 908 This document requests a new IANA registry be created under the IS-IS
> > 909 TLV Codepoints Registry to control the assignment of sub-TLV types
> > 910 for the SID Sub-TLVs specified in this document - Se
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-09: No Record
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please r
On March 25, 2021 at 6:03:53 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
I have some comments (see below) -- nothing major. I look forward to -12.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
...
> >>> Just one high-level comment: It is not clear to me why all the
> >>> behaviors from rfc8986 are not covered in this document
Hi Chongfeng,
From: Chongfeng Xie
Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 3:26 AM
To: Acee Lindem , Jie Dong ,
"lsr@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: Re: [Lsr]WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for
Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” -
draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
Hi, Acee,
Hi, Acee,
Thank you for your comments. I agree with your consideration about using mature
and deployed control plane technologies, and this document does not introduce
any new IS-IS encodings. While the resource-aware segments has the same format
as the legacy SR segments, the difference is in t
