Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-11

2021-04-09 Thread Alvaro Retana
Peter: I’m ok with the text below. Thanks! Alvaro. On April 9, 2021 at 4:12:43 AM, Peter Psenak (ppse...@cisco.com (mailto:ppse...@cisco.com)) wrote: > > 268 In cases where a locator advertisement is received in both a Prefix > > 269 Reachability TLV and an SRv6 Locator TLV - (e.g. prefix, pr

Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-11: (with COMMENT)

2021-04-09 Thread Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Hello All, We've posted the (final?) update for this draft to cover the minor changes as discussed with John (in the thread below) and with Ben (in a parallel thread). https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-12 Thanks once again for the reviews and inputs to

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-12.txt

2021-04-09 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : OSPF Prefix Originator Extensions Authors : Aijun Wang Acee Lindem

Re: [Lsr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-11

2021-04-09 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Alvaro, please see inline (##PP): On 09/04/2021 00:17, Alvaro Retana wrote: Peter: Hi! I looked at -12. I have a couple of nits/minor comments below.  There's only one significant one related to the information that must be shared between the Prefix Reachability TLV and the SRv6 Locator T