Hi, all:
I support adoption of both YANG related drafts.
-Qin
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 6:48 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org
> Subject: [Ls
Hi Qin,
Sorry, but I find your latest proposed text very confusing, because we should
be focusing on integrity protection and not privacy (=secrecy) of the TLV. So I
would prefer to keep the text as-is, with the addition of a reference to the
IS-IS and OSPF security mechanisms that were discuss
Yaron:
Thank for clarification. I agree to keep the last sentence in the second
paragraph of section 7 as is.
But I prefer to add the addition references in the previous sentence as follows:
"
Thus before advertisement of the PCE security parameters, it MUST be insured
that the IGP is
protected f
So let me suggest:
Thus before advertisement of the PCE security parameters, it MUST be
insured that the IGP protects the authentication and integrity of the PCED TLV
using the mechanisms defined in
[RFC5310] and [RFC5709], if the mechanism described in this document is
used.
Mor
The proposed change sounds good to me, Thanks Yaron.
-Qin
-邮件原件-
发件人: Yaron Sheffer [mailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2021年8月10日 21:58
收件人: Qin Wu ; sec...@ietf.org
抄送: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org;
last-c...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
主题: Re: Secdir last cal
Qin -
Just to note that RFC 5310 does NOT replace or obsolete RFC 5304. Both RFC 's
have their uses.
Please be sure to reference both RFCs in your updated text.
Thanx.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Qin Wu
> Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 6:13 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Ya
Agree, thanks Les for additional suggestions.
发件人： Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>
收件人： Qin Wumailto:bill...@huawei.com>>;Yaron
Sheffermailto:yaronf.i...@gmail.com>>;secdirmailto:sec...@ietf.org>>
抄送：
draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support.allmailto:draft-ietf-lsr-pce-di
From: Lsr on behalf of Yaron Sheffer
Sent: 10 August 2021 14:57
So let me suggest:
An offlist suggestion for you to consider
OLD
Thus before advertisement of the PCE security parameters, it MUST be
insured that the IGP protects the authentication and integrity of the PCED TLV
using the
Reviewer: Ron Bonica
Review result: Ready
Good idea!
___
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
Speaking as a WG Member:
In reviewing RFC 8919 and RFC 8920, it is clear that the ASLA mechanism was
to be used for new link attributes and applications. While the documents do not
mandate that there never could be a new way to advertise link attributes, this
was clearly the intent. Indeed, i
Still waiting on this mail to the list.
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Jul 21, 2021, at 6:18 PM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> The WGLC has ended.
>
> I may have missed it but I do not see any feedback from Xiaodong Duan for
> IPR. That is still required to the list.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
>> On Feb 17,
11 matches
Mail list logo
