Les,
I am fine with the revised text and addresses my concern.
Rgds
Shraddha
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 2:15 AM
To: Shraddha Hegde ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-lsr-r
Shraddha -
Please see {LES2:] inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Shraddha Hegde
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 2:16 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ;
> lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis-
> 01.txt
>
Hi,
Considering there are quite a few requests that didn't make the agenda, the
chairs are planning to have an interim after IETF 114, targeting early
September.
The agenda has been updated. Please let us know if you have any questions
or concerns.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 8:56
Hi Greg,
That in fact even further highlights the benefits of using app to app
> network quality detection. When app has been exposed with more then one
> network path.
>
GIM>> I imagine that application layer OAM would be more burdensome than
OAM in the underlay. Of course, the detection of some
Hi Robert,
a note on active OAM in-lined below under GIM>>.
Regards,
Greg
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 11:12 PM Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Good point !
>
> That proves that if PE-PE OAM does not follow app to app path it is
> useless. I would tend to agree.
>
GIM>> I agree, and the requirement for the a
Les,
Pls see inline [SH2]
Juniper Business Use Only
-Original Message-
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2022 10:21 PM
To: Shraddha Hegde ; Shraddha Hegde
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-lsr-rfc8919bis-01.txt
[External Email
