Hi Russ,
Thanks for your review and feedback.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:45 AM Russ Mundy via Datatracker
wrote:
> Reviewer: Russ Mundy
> Review result: Ready
>
> The draft gives a good description of the protocol aspects and has a clear,
> well written security considerations
Reviewer: Russ Mundy
Review result: Ready
The draft gives a good description of the protocol aspects and has a clear,
well written security considerations section.
>From my perspective, it is ready to go.
Russ Mundy
___
Lsr mailing list
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'IS-IS Extensions in Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and
GMPLS Traffic Engineering'
(draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-07.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Link State Routing Working Group.
The IESG
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:58 AM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
wrote:
> John - Thank you for the followup.
>
> Murray - my sincere apologies for not responding to your comments. I
> remember reviewing your email but somehow I lost track of it and never
> responded.
>
> I have posted V7 of the draft to
John - Thank you for the followup.
Murray - my sincere apologies for not responding to your comments. I remember
reviewing your email but somehow I lost track of it and never responded.
I have posted V7 of the draft to address both the original comments from Murray
and the additional comments
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IS-IS Extensions in Support of Inter-Autonomous
System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering
Authors :
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your review and please check inline below for responses.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 1:25 PM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Has Issues
>
> Ready with Issues.
>
> This document defines the protocol extensions
Hi Tom,
On 9/28/22, 5:41 AM, "tom petch" wrote:
On 26/09/2022 18:02, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Link State Routing WG (lsr) to
> consider the following document: - 'IS-IS Flood Reflection'
> as Experimental RFC
>
> The IESG
On 26/09/2022 18:02, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Link State Routing WG (lsr) to
consider the following document: - 'IS-IS Flood Reflection'
as Experimental RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action.
