Tony,
I believe those changes will address my comments. If I don’t get around to
updating my review, please accept this email as “proof” :)
From: Antoni Przygienda
Date: Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 5:45 AM
To: Rich Salz , "sec...@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection@ietf.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IS-IS Flood Reflection
Authors : Tony Przygienda
Chris Bowers
Roni, thanks for your comments
1. We traditionally do not specify length, one reason being that TLV format
allows sub-TLVs and hence the length encompasses those as well
2. Clarified the case a bit and added the coma
* Tony
From: Roni Even via Datatracker
Date: Friday, 7 October 20
Rich, thanks for comments
1. I will explain in glossary quickly that L1 and L2 pertains to ISIS
concepts
2. Paragraph moved before figure
3. Paragraph 1 and 2 talk about different tunnel types hence I kept it
separate. I pointed out the tunnel type.
* Tony
From: Rich Salz via Da
