Bruno -
Some responses inline - speaking only for myself - not necessarily for all of
the co-authors...
From: Lsr On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 6:04 AM
To: Tony Li ; lsr
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : IS-IS Flood Reflection
Authors : Tony Przygienda
Chris Bowers
Roman, thanks for review,
1. As to SHOULD NOT vs. MUST NOT was answered in Murray’s comment already.
Quote
“
Yes, the draft is written intentionally in such loose way to leave space for
implementations/future drafts where a node can be e.g. client of multiple
reflectors, a reflector has 2
It would be nice to have a little more about the points of emphasis, but do
with that feedback what you like.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 10:55 AM Antoni Przygienda wrote:
> Martin, I added one ssentence to calrify this
>
>
>
> “
>
> It is expected that deployment at scale, and suitable time in
Martin, I added one ssentence to calrify this
“
It is expected that deployment at scale, and suitable time in operation, will
provide
sufficient evidence to either make this extension a standard, or
suggest necessary modifications
to accomplish this.
“
* Tony
