Dear LSR Working Group,
I have read the document. Swisscom is one of the operators deploying “IGP
Unreachable Prefix Announcement” in their SRv6 network. The document addresses
the challenge of fast convergance in a SRv6 aggregated IGP domain. I therfore
support the adoption in LSR.
Best
Hi, Acee:
It‘s you that repeat the FALSE statements. What I can do is to give you the
FACT again.
Please see inline below for the response to your FALSE statements.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
发件人: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2023年9月6日 20:44
收件人:
Hi Aijun,
I think we are repeating ourselves here. However, let me add a couple points.
The fact that you added the BGP PIC use case to your draft when the WG
indicated that was the problem to be solved doesn’t make you the owner of the
use case. Additionally, the fact that you were offered
Aijun,
On 06/09/2023 11:02, Aijun Wang wrote:
My proposal is that we postpone the adoption of this draft, and discuss
offline the merger document on the coming IETF118 meeting.
I want to be very clear, there is nothing to be merged.
regards,
Peter
Then, we can submit the merged document
Hi, Peter:Aijun WangChina TelecomOn Sep 6, 2023, at 15:57, Peter Psenak wrote:Aijun,WG adoption should be done based on the draft content, the quality of the solution it describes and not based on the draft age or order.[WAJ] Not exactly. We should also respect the original
Aijun,
WG adoption should be done based on the draft content, the quality of
the solution it describes and not based on the draft age or order.
Multiple people have pointed out over the years that the solution that
you propose in your draft - e.g. using router-id of 0 to indicate the
