Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition (NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06

2024-01-22 Thread Chongfeng Xie
Hi Xuesong, Thanks for your support and review comments. We are working on a new revision which will take your comments into consideration. As for your suggestion to add reference to the more scalable solution, according to the comments from Acee, we would not mention the specific solution

Re: [Lsr] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-19

2024-01-22 Thread Yingzhen Qu
HI Reshad, I've uploaded version -21, which includes the changes we discussed. Thanks, Yingzhen On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:52 AM Reshad Rahman wrote: > Thanks Yingzhen. Yes I am good with that. > > Regards, > Reshad. > > On Monday, January 22, 2024, 02:39:17 PM EST, Yingzhen Qu < >

[Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-21.txt

2024-01-22 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-21.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Link State Routing (LSR) WG of the IETF. Title: A YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing for the MPLS Data Plane Authors: Stephane Litkowski Yingzhen Qu Pushpasis Sarkar

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes (01/05/2024 - 01/19/2024)

2024-01-22 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Hi all, The adoption call is closed, and the document is not adopted. The author has requested an extension of the adoption call for one week, however since we fail to see new technical points being discussed, the chairs decided to close the call as planned. During the second adoption call,

Re: [Lsr] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-19

2024-01-22 Thread Reshad Rahman
Thanks Yingzhen. Yes I am good with that. Regards,Reshad. On Monday, January 22, 2024, 02:39:17 PM EST, Yingzhen Qu wrote: Hi Reshad, Thanks for the review. The "sid-binding-tlv" and "mt-sid-binding-tlv" are relatively big with more content, so I thought it might be easier to read

Re: [Lsr] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-19

2024-01-22 Thread Yingzhen Qu
Hi Reshad, Thanks for the review. The "sid-binding-tlv" and "mt-sid-binding-tlv" are relatively big with more content, so I thought it might be easier to read with a container. But you're right, it's not following the YANG traditions, how about the following? container sid-binding-tlvs {

Re: [Lsr] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-19

2024-01-22 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi, Typically we have a container (plural) including a list (singular). In -20 it was done the other way round. Since this is read-only, IIRC we don't need the container including a list as we do for read-write. Is the container there for convenience? Regards,Reshad. augment

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "Applicability of IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Network Resource Partition (NRP)" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-06

2024-01-22 Thread Mach Chen
Hi Acee, I have read the latest version of the document. It's just an informational document and describes a way for using IS-IS MT implement SR based NRP, it gives an informative reference to the operators and implementors who have interests. I think it's a useful document and ready for