Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link

Hi Yingzhen, Thank you for the reminder. As a co-author, my answer is: yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Best regards, Weiqiang Cheng ---原始邮件--- 发件人: Yingzhen Qu 发送时间: 2024-03-09 08:58:25 收件人: draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link lsr

[Lsr] IPR Poll for draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link

Hi all, There is an IPR disclosure filed for this draft on 3/8/2024: IPR disclosures (ietf.org) Also not all authors have responded to the IPR poll in the adoption call thread, so I'd like to ask all t

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link(02/23/24 - 03/08/24)

Hi Yingzhen and WG， I support this adoption as a co-author and sincerely appreciate all your comments. The IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Best Regards, Liyan 邮件原文发件人：Yingzhen Qu 收件人：lsr ,lsr-chairs 抄　送: (无)发送时间：2024-02-23 13:27:50主题：[Lsr] WG

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-16

Hi Tony, Thank you so much for the responses and changes! All of this sounds great. One reply inline: On 3/8/24 10:37, Tony Li wrote: Are edges the same as links, in which case please consider using consistent terms? In general, edges and links are synonymous in graph theory and routing. H

Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-16

Hi Reese, Thank you for your comments. Please see inline. > Introduction: > "However it is very clear that using an Exterior Gateway Protocol as an IGP is > sub-optimal, if only due to the configuration overhead." To me, the "very > clear" and the "if only due" sound like they're contradicting