[Lsr] Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-10: (with COMMENT)

John – Bruno wrote the new text – so best if we wait for him to respond. Looks like he will be back next week. But my understanding is that your interpretation is correct. If Bruno agrees, then we can spin a new version with better wording. Thanx for your feedback and patience. Les

[Lsr] Re: Working Group Last Call for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07

Ketan - does the -11 version of the draft address 1 or 3 below? I know it doesn't address 2. Thanks, Acee Thanks, Acee > On Apr 27, 2024, at 2:16 AM, Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > > Hi Acee, > > I've responded to the thread with Shraddha. There are still 3 issues open - > (1) an error with

[Lsr] Re: Working Group Last Call for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07

Any update? Thanks, Acee > On Apr 26, 2024, at 11:53 AM, Acee Lindem wrote: > > Hi Ketan, Shraddha and Les, > > > I’m trying to conclude this thread and send this document to the AD. I’ve > read the Emails but I must admit I don’t understand all the arguments. > > > Ketan - if we have

[Lsr] Milestones changed for lsr WG

Deleted milestone "OSPFv3 Dual Stack (single instance)". URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lsr/about/ ___ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org