Hi Alexander,
see some answers inline.
---
Anton
On 02/08/19 11:25, Alexander Okonnikov wrote:
Hi Acee,
For me current version doesn't change the solution. My comments are follow:
1. Introduction
"TE Extensions to OSPFv2 [RFC3630] and OSPFv3 [RFC5329] have been
described to support
Hello all,
the new revision addresses 3 comments raised during the LC discussion.
---
Anton Smirnov
On 12/10/18 17:40, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG
h that SPF for one AF can utilise
LSPs as shortcuts, created for other AF. My understanding that these two
tasks need to be discussed separately. It could be two different
documents, or two different sections of the same one.
Thank you.
25 окт. 2018 г., в 19:57, Anton Smirnov <mailto:asmir.
Hi Ketan,
1. I am not sure I understood the question. Your example says "using the
TE topology from OSPFv2 to compute a tunnel". In that case TE router ID
is an IPv4 address. So no, advertising IPv6 address won't help to
identify the tunnel.
2. my opinion (not discussed with other
Hi Gunter,
we agree with the proposed change and will make it in the next
revision, probably even rephrase this sentence.
---
Anton
On 10/24/18 12:59, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
Looks fine. One item I would like to see changed (or at least discussed)
I have a
functionality.
Thanks,
Acee
*From: *Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>
*Date: *Thursday, April 19, 2018 at 5:29 PM
*To: *"Anton Smirnov (asmirnov)" <asmir...@cisco.com>,
"draft-ietf-ospf-xaf...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-xa
w author Alvaro (of OSPF TTZ fame) could help
with some generic text preceding the specific IGP Shortcut use case.
Let me see if I can massage the backward compatibility text. I’m
requested a Routing Directorate review and I’m going to start the LSR WG
last call shortly.
Thanks,
Acee
*From:
if answers in my previous email didn't clarify
your questions/concerns.
---
Anton
On 04/07/18 23:06, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Anton,
On 4/6/18, 7:33 AM, "Anton Smirnov (asmirnov)" <asmir...@cisco.com> wrote:
Hi Acee,
my answers below (I didn't vet
Hi Acee,
my answers below (I didn't vet them with other authors, so they may
express different opinions).
> 1. Have you considered a shorter name for the RFC? For example: “OSPF
> Cross Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels”?
Your proposed variant drops two pieces: "Routing
