[Lsr] Re: Consensus Call on "IS-IS Distributed Flooding Reduction" - draft-ietf-lsr-distoptflood-05

I also agree with splitting this work into two drafts. Thanks, Ayan On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 2:22 AM Yingzhen Qu wrote: > Speaking as a WG member, I support having separate drafts. Like Les said, > this is helpful to allow issues specific to each of the proposals to be > discussed independently.

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for "Restart Signaling for IS-IS" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-01

Support. Thanks, Ayan On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jeff Tantsura wrote: > yes/support > > > Cheers, > Jeff > On Mar 19, 2019, 7:30 AM -0700, Acee Lindem (acee) , > wrote: > > This begins a 3 WG last call for the subject document. The extra week is > since the IETF is next week. Please enter

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

Support. Thanks, Ayan On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 4:54 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > This begins a two-week WG adoption call for the subject draft. As anyone > who has been following the topic knows, there are a lot of proposal in this > space. However, as WG co-chair, I believe this simple IS-IS e

Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt

Support. Thanks, Ayan On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:41 PM Jeff Tantsura wrote: > I support publication of this draft, simple and straightforward. > > Cheers, > Jeff > On Oct 23, 2018, 12:49 PM -0700, Acee Lindem (acee) , > wrote: > > Speaking as a WG member: > > > > I support publication of this