Les:
Hi!
Just to close this loop: I looked at -12 and we’re good. :-)
I’ll now wait for draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse to catch up to process
both documents together.
Thanks!!
Alvaro.
On March 21, 2020 at 1:09:56 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (ginsb...@cisco.com)
wrote:
Following some offl
Alvaro -
Following some offline discussion with you, V12 of the draft has been posted to
address your additional comments.
Some responses inline. Look for "Les3".
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Retana
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2020 8:54 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lin
On February 27, 2020 at 11:00:19 PM, Les Ginsberg wrote:
Les:
Hi! How are you?
Some of the responses, yours and mine, feel like we're not
communicating well, like we are talking past each other. I am
probably not clearly asking the right questions... I think it would
be a good idea to talk
Alvaro -
Thanx for the continued review.
V11 of the draft has been posted to address your additional comments.
More inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvaro Retana
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 4:42 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; draft-ietf-isis-te-
> a...@ietf.org
> Cc: Ace
On February 7, 2020 at 1:50:58 AM, Les Ginsberg wrote:
Les:
Hi!
> We have published V10 of the draft addressing your comments.
It looks like your copy of my review was truncated (not sure why).
The archive has the complete version, and I pasted the remaining
comments at the end of this message.
Alvaro -
Thanx for your patience.
We have published V10 of the draft addressing your comments.
Note that the authors of the IS-IS and OSPF drafts are "synchronizing" as there
is a lot of similarity in your comments regarding the two drafts. We have
decided to close all issues with you for the I
On January 15, 2020 at 3:48:31 PM, Les Ginsberg wrote:
Les:
Hi!
...
> 5. Deployment Considerations
> 6. Attribute Advertisements and Enablement
> 7. Interoperability, Backwards Compatibility and Migration
> Concerns
>
> Of these I think 5 and 7 could logically be combined and fall under the
> he
Alvaro -
A few pointed questions as we work on the revisions.
>
> (A) Deployment Considerations
>
> This document contains what I would characterize as a "distributed"
> Deployment Considerations section through §5, §6 and §7. There is a
> lot of content, but I still made some comments in-line
On January 10, 2020 at 10:53:40 AM, Les Ginsberg wrote:
Les:
Hi!
> We are working on addressing your comments - but it will take us a bit of
> time to complete that - please be patient.
You have all been very patient with me already -- I can only return
the favor. :-)
> One question. In sever
Alvaro -
Happy New Year to you!
Thanx for the extensive review of this draft and
draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-10.
It is clear that you spent a good deal of time on this and covered a lot of
ground - much appreciated.
We are working on addressing your comments - but it will take us a bit
Dear Authors:
Happy New Year!
I have finished reading this document, reviewing the e-mail archive
and all the various reviews and comments. Quoting one of the authors,
"it is essential that the two IGPs provide equivalent functionality"
[1] -- so I have considered draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-re
11 matches
Mail list logo
