On April 22, 2021 at 7:26:57 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
> I have posted an updated version of the draft that has the new
> registries defined for all flags fields defined in it.
Thanks Peter!
I've started the IETF LC.
Alvaro.
___
Lsr mailing list
Hi Alvaro,
I have posted an updated version of the draft that has the new
registries defined for all flags fields defined in it.
thanks,
Peter
On 09/04/2021 22:54, Alvaro Retana wrote:
Peter:
I’m ok with the text below.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On April 9, 2021 at 4:12:43 AM, Peter Psenak
Peter:
I’m ok with the text below.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On April 9, 2021 at 4:12:43 AM, Peter Psenak (ppse...@cisco.com
(mailto:ppse...@cisco.com)) wrote:
> > 268 In cases where a locator advertisement is received in both a Prefix
> > 269 Reachability TLV and an SRv6 Locator TLV - (e.g. prefix,
Hi Alvaro,
please see inline (##PP):
On 09/04/2021 00:17, Alvaro Retana wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
I looked at -12.
I have a couple of nits/minor comments below. There's only one
significant one related to the information that must be shared between
the Prefix Reachability TLV and the SRv6 Locator
Peter:
Hi!
I looked at -12.
I have a couple of nits/minor comments below. There's only one
significant one related to the information that must be shared between
the Prefix Reachability TLV and the SRv6 Locator TLV: it is currently
phrased as an example.
We're also waiting of the resolution
Hi Alvaro,
please see inline (##PP3):
On 30/03/2021 19:44, Alvaro Retana wrote:
On March 25, 2021 at 6:03:53 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
I have some comments (see below) -- nothing major. I look forward to -12.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
...
Just one high-level comment: It is not
Hi Les,
On 31/03/2021 07:01, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
Alvaro/Peter -
In regards to:
...
906 12.5. Sub-Sub-TLVs for SID Sub-TLVs
908 This document requests a new IANA registry be created under the IS-IS
909 TLV Codepoints Registry to control the assignment of sub-TLV types
910 for the
Alvaro/Peter -
In regards to:
> ...
> > 906 12.5. Sub-Sub-TLVs for SID Sub-TLVs
> >
> > 908 This document requests a new IANA registry be created under the IS-IS
> > 909 TLV Codepoints Registry to control the assignment of sub-TLV types
> > 910 for the SID Sub-TLVs specified in this document -
On March 25, 2021 at 6:03:53 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
I have some comments (see below) -- nothing major. I look forward to -12.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
...
> >>> Just one high-level comment: It is not clear to me why all the
> >>> behaviors from rfc8986 are not covered in this
Hi Alvaro,
please see inline (##PP2):
On 16/03/2021 21:33, Alvaro Retana wrote:
On March 11, 2021 at 5:46:51 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
thanks for the review, please see inline (##PP):
It looks like you didn't get the whole review (Outlook bug). Take a
look at it here:
On March 11, 2021 at 5:46:51 AM, Peter Psenak wrote:
Peter:
Hi!
> thanks for the review, please see inline (##PP):
It looks like you didn't get the whole review (Outlook bug). Take a
look at it here:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/a4a4I4fP73DyfKsdKnRw_tRuStQ/
...
> > Just one
Thanks for your review and comments Bruno and Peter for quick resolution.
Acee
On 3/12/21, 9:20 AM, "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
wrote:
Hi Peter,
> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 3:13 PM
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> please see
Hi Peter,
> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 3:13 PM
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> please see inline:
>
> On 12/03/2021 11:39, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> > Peter, Alvaro
> >
> >> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, March
Hi Bruno,
please see inline:
On 12/03/2021 11:39, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Peter, Alvaro
From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:47 AM
[...]
...
221 4.3. Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type
223 The Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type specifies the
Peter, Alvaro
> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:47 AM
[...]
> > ...
> > 221 4.3. Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type
> >
> > 223 The Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type specifies the maximum number
> of SIDs
> > 224 that can be included as part of the
Hi Alvaro,
thanks for the review, please see inline (##PP):
On 26/02/2021 19:19, Alvaro Retana wrote:
Dear authors:
Please find below my review of this document. I appreciate you and
the WG discussing the details, but there is more work needed to be
done before starting the IETF LC (details
Dear authors:
Please find below my review of this document. I appreciate you and
the WG discussing the details, but there is more work needed to be
done before starting the IETF LC (details inline).
Just one high-level comment: It is not clear to me why all the
behaviors from rfc8986 are not
17 matches
Mail list logo
