Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2022-08-19 Thread John Scudder
LGTM, thanks. —John > On Aug 19, 2022, at 1:38 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: > > John - > > V3 of the draft has been posted which I believe addresses all of your > comments. > > Please let me know if there are remaining issues. > > Note that a few additional format diffs were introd

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2022-08-18 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
John - V3 of the draft has been posted which I believe addresses all of your comments. Please let me know if there are remaining issues. Note that a few additional format diffs were introduced by the new author tools (not directly by me). Les > -Original Message- > From: John Scudd

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2022-08-18 Thread John Scudder
Hi Les, Thanks for your prompt reply. My comments in line below. > On Aug 18, 2022, at 12:49 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > wrote: [snipped] > I have a couple of other points I’ll raise here instead of in line. > > 1. I was a little surprised in the Acknowledgements to see that Les is > than

Re: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2022-08-17 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
John – Thanx for the thoughtful review. I accept all of your editorial changes except as noted below. Responses inline. From: Lsr On Behalf Of John Scudder Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 12:02 PM To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf

[Lsr] AD review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-02

2022-08-17 Thread John Scudder
Hi Authors, Thanks for your patience as this clean and easy-to-review document sat in my queue for too long. :-( Here’s my review. I’ve supplied my comments in the form of an edited copy of the draft. Minor editorial suggestions (including at least two reversions to the language of the base do