Robert/John -
I have posted a new version which addresses this issue.
I hope this clears the discussion.
I also (as promised) made the same change to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis/ and posted a new
version of that document.
Les
> -Original Message-
> F
John -
The solution you propose is fine with me.
I will update it in the next version.
As we are still waiting for a few reviews I will wait a bit in case other
changes are needed.
I will do the same to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis/ as well.
Les
> -Origina
On 5/3/23 1:12 PM, John Scudder wrote:
On May 3, 2023, at 11:04 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
2) Please reconsider the link to the mailarchive in the RFC. Put it in the
shepherd writeup or in the history in the datatracker as a comment (chairs
can
do this). Otherwise it adds to the list
> On May 3, 2023, at 11:04 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> wrote:
>
>> 2) Please reconsider the link to the mailarchive in the RFC. Put it in the
>> shepherd writeup or in the history in the datatracker as a comment (chairs
>> can
>> do this). Otherwise it adds to the list of URLs that we have to
Robert -
Thanx for your review - apologies for the delay in responding.
Please see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 1:09 PM
> To: gen-...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
