gyali mailto:wangyal...@huawei.com>>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 9:19 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org> mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Lsr] New Version for draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00
Hello WG,
Considering the Hop-by-Hop Options header has been used for IOAM
[I-D.i
etter to use another word and rephrase the related text.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Lsr on behalf of wangyali
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 9:19 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] New Version for draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00
Hello WG,
Considering the Hop-by-Hop O
the private line.
BR.
Huanan Chen
From: wangyali<mailto:wangyal...@huawei.com>
Date: 2020-10-29 21:19
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] New Version for draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00
Hello WG,
Considering the Hop-by-Hop Options header has been used for IOAM
[I-D.ie
: wangyali
Date: 2020-10-29 21:19
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] New Version for draft-wang-lsr-hbh-process-00
Hello WG,
Considering the Hop-by-Hop Options header has been used for IOAM
[I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options], Alternate Marking method
[I-D.ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark], etc., but as specified in
Hello WG,
Considering the Hop-by-Hop Options header has been used for IOAM
[I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options], Alternate Marking method
[I-D.ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark], etc., but as specified in RFC8200, the
Hop-by-Hop Options header is only examined and processed if it is explicitly
configured.
