Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-10

2022-10-22 Thread Salz, Rich
Tony, I believe those changes will address my comments. If I don’t get around to updating my review, please accept this email as “proof” :) From: Antoni Przygienda Date: Saturday, October 22, 2022 at 5:45 AM To: Rich Salz , "sec...@ietf.org" Cc: "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection@ietf.

Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-10

2022-10-22 Thread Antoni Przygienda
Rich, thanks for comments 1. I will explain in glossary quickly that L1 and L2 pertains to ISIS concepts 2. Paragraph moved before figure 3. Paragraph 1 and 2 talk about different tunnel types hence I kept it separate. I pointed out the tunnel type. * Tony From: Rich Salz via Da

Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-10

2022-10-06 Thread John Scudder
Thanks for the review, Rich. One tiny nit, mostly for the authors: > On Oct 3, 2022, at 12:23 PM, Rich Salz via Datatracker > wrote: > > s/could be in most extreme case/could be in THE most extreme case/ Please don’t put “the” in all caps when you do the edit. Even though there’s no formal re

[Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flood-reflection-10

2022-10-03 Thread Rich Salz via Datatracker
Reviewer: Rich Salz Review result: Has Nits I am a routing naïf and do not have a lot of time these days. I hope this review is still useful, anyway. The glossary was very helpful. I still don't have a clear understanding of L1 and L2. The picture is a tour de force. The description "Figure 1