Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

The work is adopted. Authors, please resubmit with new name draft-ietf-lsr-flood-reflection and updating the track to experimental. Thanks, Chris. > On Jun 10, 2020, at 3:28 PM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > https://datatracker

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

I support WG adoption of draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection. The only IPR that I am aware of that may be related to this draft has already been disclosed. Chris On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:29 PM Christian Hopps wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > http

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Hi Les, > I am not yet overly enthused about approaches which promote non-hierarchical > network architectures. But it seems clear that there is interest in deploying > non-hierarchical solutions and both drafts present solutions > which merit further evaluation. I think that there’s some co

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

-Original Message- > > > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 12:29 PM > > > To: lsr@ietf.org > > > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps > > > > > > Subject: [Lsr] WG adoption cal

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

PM > To: lsr@ietf.org > Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps > > Subject: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 > > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.o

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Working Group, I support the adoption of this document. /Loa On 11/06/2020 03:28, Christian Hopps wrote: This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection The draft would be adopted on the Experimental tra

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:43 PM John Scudder wrote: > Hi All, > > I just did a full read-through of -01. Without denigrating any other > solutions, I support adoption of this one. > > I do have a few comments and nits, below. > > - Paragraph 2 of section 9 is unclear, IMO; I hope this can be imp

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Hi All, I just did a full read-through of -01. Without denigrating any other solutions, I support adoption of this one. I do have a few comments and nits, below. - Paragraph 2 of section 9 is unclear, IMO; I hope this can be improved in the next version. It reads exactly like a protocol expert

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

support as co-author. not aware of any additional IPR beside the one disclosed on the tracker already thx == t On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:29 PM Christian Hopps wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-przygienda-lsr-fl

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

I support this draft as experimental track. Thanks Gyan On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 4:10 PM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Speaking as WG member: > > I support WG adoption of this draft on the experimental track. I think it > is better for the WG to move forward and get some data points on these > c

[Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

I support the adoption of this draft. Not aware of any relevant IPR at Comcast. Thanks, Alankar ___ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Speaking as WG member: I support WG adoption of this draft on the experimental track. I think it is better for the WG to move forward and get some data points on these competing solutions than to be gridlocked. I'm not that concerned with the tunneling requirement for L1/L2 routers given th

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Support the adoption of the draft. Juniper Business Use Only From: Lsr On Behalf Of Melchior Aelmans Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:07 PM To: Christian Hopps Cc: lsr@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Support the adoption. Thanks, Sandy 原始邮件 发件人：ChristianHopps 收件人：lsr@ietf.org ; 抄送人：lsr-cha...@ietf.org ;lsr-...@ietf.org ;Christian Hopps ; 日 期 ：2020年06月11日 03:29 主 题 ：[Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01 This begins a 2 week WG adoption call

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

yes/support the adoption Cheers, Jeff On Jun 11, 2020, 12:04 PM -0700, Jordan Head , wrote: > Support. > > The draft identifies and addresses the problem, and quite cleanly I might add. > > Jordan Head > > On 6/10/20, 3:29 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" on behalf of cho...@chopps.org> wr

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Support. The draft identifies and addresses the problem, and quite cleanly I might add. Jordan Head On 6/10/20, 3:29 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote: [External Email. Be cautious of content] This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: https://

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

As you are an author please provide the requested feedback on IPR. Thanks, Chris. > On Jun 11, 2020, at 1:19 PM, Lee, Yiu wrote: > > Supported previously and support now to adopt this draft as Experimental > track. > > On 6/10/20, 3:28 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" > wrote: > >

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Supported previously and support now to adopt this draft as Experimental track. On 6/10/20, 3:28 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Christian Hopps" wrote: This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-przygienda

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Hi, As stated previously I support adoption of this draft. Cheers, Melchior On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 9:29 PM Christian Hopps wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection > > The draft would b

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

JNPR holds relevant IPR on the draft. We are in the process of disclosing it ASAP thanks -- tony On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:29 PM Christian Hopps wrote: > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any > IPR that applies to this draft. I am not a lawyer nor an author, but the area proxy IPR filing (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4016/ ) may also apply to this draft. Tony

Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

Christian, thanks much for that. As there were already two different threads over last months where a good amount of people/companies expressed their support for the draft to progress as WG item, I don't expect to need to pester them again but maybe more will chime in here ... thanks -- tony On

[Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection-01

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection The draft would be adopted on the Experimental track. Please indicate your support or objection by June 24, 2020. Authors, please respond to the list indicatin