Create testfile in tmpdir to be consistent with other tests.
The makes the behavior consistent with other testcases if /tmp is a
different fs than where the testcase is run from.
--- ltp-full-20071031.orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/splice/splice01.c
2007-11-02 03:34:57.0 -0500
+++ ltp-f
If we don't close the fd's we open and are running on NFS we get warnings
like:
tst_rmdir(): rmobj(/tmp/wri7hJN5W) failed:
unlink(/tmp/wri7hJN5W/.nfs02770dc10001) failed; errno=16: Device or
resource busy
--- ltp-full-20071031.orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/creat/creat01.c
2007-
I get the following when I run fchown03 on a nfs root fs:
fchown031 FAIL : testfile: Incorrect mode permissions 0104770,
Expected 0100770
Its not clear if this is expected behavior or not on a NFS fs.
- k
-
This SF
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 17:45 +0800, Cai Qian wrote:
> Hi Subrata,
>
> From: Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH][KDUMP] the script failed to detect the present of
> vmcore
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:59:18 +0530
>
> > Hi Cai,
> >
> > Can you kindly share your LTP-KDUMP
Hi Subrata,
From: Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH][KDUMP] the script failed to detect the present of
vmcore
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:59:18 +0530
> Hi Cai,
>
> Can you kindly share your LTP-KDUMP test results for all the 3 patches
> that you sent earlier, for the iss
CQ,
All the three patches that you submitted will be taken care soon. As i
informed you earlier that Poornima is also working on some automation in
LTP-KDUMP, she will integrate your pacthes with herś.
But i would require the test results for all the changes that you had
done in KDUMP, as, i want t
True. And this also has been taken care of.
--Subrata--
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 13:33 +0800, Cai Qian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The test case attempts to read all /proc/ directories. However,
> processes may disappear during the test, so we have seen errors like
> this,
>
> /proc/2143: lstat: No such file
This has been Applied.
--Subrata--
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 13:20 +0800, Cai Qian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> proc01 test case attempts to read files which are not designed to be
> read. Therefore, it causes the test to fail. For example,
>
> --w--- 1 root root 0 Nov 13 13:09 /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> The
On Nov 13, 2007, at 2:23 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
any possibility of moving LTP to using git for source control?
>>>
>>> not until sf.net
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> any possibility of moving LTP to using git for source control?
> >
> > not until sf.net supports it
>
> Any particular reason it has to be host
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Khem Raj wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> This patch makes this shell script runnable on dash in addition to bash.
> >> If you find it useful please apply.
> >
> > imo, it is not useful. your dash is broken, so compla
On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> any possibility of moving LTP to using git for source control?
>
> not until sf.net supports it
Any particular reason it has to be hosted on sf.net?
I'm sure kernel.org would be happy to host
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Khem Raj wrote:
>> This patch makes this shell script runnable on dash in addition to bash.
>> If you find it useful please apply.
>
> imo, it is not useful. your dash is broken, so complain to the
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Khem Raj wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > imo, it is not useful. your dash is broken, so complain to the dash
> > maintainers to fix it.
>
> never mind here it is already reported :)
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dash/+bug/92189
>
> I should have doub
14 matches
Mail list logo
