attachment is the patch file
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:38:00 +0800, Subrata Modak
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 09:22 +0800, Guo Hongruan wrote:
How to reproduce this bug:
./clone07 -i 19
I can produce this.
Before Patching:
$ ./clone07 -i 19
*** glibc detected *** ./testcases/bin/clone07
see attachment for the patch.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:06:25 +0800, Subrata Modak
wrote:
Guo,
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:57 +0800, Guo Hongruan wrote:
Ok, I will
I am hoping that you will resend a complete set for both mount02.c and
mount03.c with Caiś comments. Post Caiś acknowledgement, i
On Mon, Apr 13 2009, Manas K Nayak wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> >This patch attempts to add splice writes support. In essence, it just
> >calls generic_file_splice_write() after doing a little sanity check.
> >This would allow LTTng users that are using NFS to store trace data.
> >There could be more app
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 09:22 +0800, Guo Hongruan wrote:
> How to reproduce this bug:
>
> ./clone07 -i 19
I can produce this.
Before Patching:
$ ./clone07 -i 19
*** glibc detected *** ./testcases/bin/clone07: double free or
corruption (top): 0x08dda008 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.s
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 07:09 +0800, CAI Qian wrote:
> From: CAI Qian
> Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case
> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:46:37 +0800 (CST)
>
> > From: CAI Qian
> > Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case
> > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:11:22 +0800 (CST)
> >
>
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 13:37 +0800, CAI Qian wrote:
> From: CAI Qian
> Subject: Re: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization
> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
>
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Tue, 4/7/09, rohit verma wrote:
> >
> >> From: rohit verma
> >> Subject: [LTP] fork05 te
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 20:56 +0800, CAI Qian wrote:
> From: "Jyothsna.ltp"
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Growfiles: Fix Test Failures
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
>
> >
> > I observed something in tlibio.h.
> >
> > LIO_IO_TYPES and LIO_WAIT_TYPES are not defined for uClinux.
> >
Send across patches attending Uclinux related issue(s).
Regards--
Subrata
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 17:52 -0700, Jyothsna.ltp wrote:
> I observed something in tlibio.h.
>
> LIO_IO_TYPES and LIO_WAIT_TYPES are not defined for uClinux.
>
> They are defined for other linux varieties like regular linux
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 23:05 -0700, CAI Qian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> --- On Fri, 4/10/09, rohit verma wrote:
>
> > From: rohit verma
> > Subject: [LTP] Issue in runcc in network-lib6 module
> > To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 8:30 PM
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have found th
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 03:48 -0600, Fan He wrote:
> hi,
>
> [Patch 1/1] Patch for fixing the openposix_timer_delete_speculative_5_1
> testcase's segment fault
>
Thanks.
Regards--
Subrata
> -modified the file
> testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/timer_delete/speculative/5-1
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 03:46 -0600, Fan He wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [Patch 1/1] Patch for fixing the openposix_getoverrun_speculative_6_1
> testcase's segment fault
Thanks. Merged.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> -modified the file
> testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/timer_getoverrun/spe
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 18:38 +0530, Manas K Nayak wrote:
> Hi Maxin,
>
> >Maxin John wrote on 04/13/2009 06:25:54 PM:
>
> > Hi Manas,
> >
> > I am very glad to know that the test program can be used in LTP for
> > cacheflush() testing. I have no objections in contributing the same
> > code to LT
Hi Josef,
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 12:12 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 12:24 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Trying to put together a list of TODO items for btrfs so we can update the
> > wiki
> > page fully. So far these things are on the list
> >
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 20:44 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Kumar reported this.
> >
> > Regards--
> > Subrata
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kumar Gala
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm seeing some weird behavior in 2.6.30-rc1 that didn't e
Guo,
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 10:57 +0800, Guo Hongruan wrote:
> Ok, I will
I am hoping that you will resend a complete set for both mount02.c and
mount03.c with Caiś comments. Post Caiś acknowledgement, i will checkin.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:56:42 +0800, CAI Qian wrote:
>
Hi Manas,
I am very glad to know that the test program can be used in LTP for
cacheflush() testing. I have no objections in contributing the same
code to LTP under GPL.
Warm Regards,
Maxin B. John
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Manas K Nayak wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>>cacheflush man page states
Hi Maxin,
>Maxin John wrote on 04/13/2009 06:25:54 PM:
> Maxin John
> 04/13/2009 06:25 PM
>
> To
>
> Manas K Nayak/India/i...@ibmin
>
> cc
>
> ltp-list , Deepakraj B
Himavantharaj/India/i...@ibmin
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [PATCH 03/03] Add cacheflush() syscall test to LTP [LKML
> Subject: cacheflus
Manas K Nayak wrote:
> Hi Suresh,
>
>> This patch attempts to add splice writes support. In essence, it just
>> calls generic_file_splice_write() after doing a little sanity check.
>> This would allow LTTng users that are using NFS to store trace data.
>> There could be more applications that coul
Hi Jens,
>This patch attempts to add splice writes support. In essence, it just
>calls generic_file_splice_write() after doing a little sanity check.
>This would allow LTTng users that are using NFS to store trace data.
>There could be more applications that could be benefitted too.
>
>I have test
Hi Suresh,
>This patch attempts to add splice writes support. In essence, it just
>calls generic_file_splice_write() after doing a little sanity check.
>This would allow LTTng users that are using NFS to store trace data.
>There could be more applications that could be benefitted too.
>
>I have te
Hi John,
>cacheflush man page states that cacheflush() will set EINVAL if cache
>parameter is not one of ICACHE, DCACHE, or BCACHE.
>In order to confirm this behavior, I have executed the below listed
>program (cacheflush_check.c) in Toshiba RBTX4937 board (MIPS) with
>2.6.29.1 kernel.
I picked
Hi Mathias,
>Hi all!
>I am using kernel 2.6.29.1 from kernel.org on a Debian 5.0 (Lenny) system
>(Intel Core2Quad).
>GCC is 4.3.2
>I have not set CONFIG_CC_OPT_SIZE.
>
>When I use clock_nanosleep with TIMER_ABSTIME with gdb and stop the execution
>by CTRL-C,
>I cannot continue the execution of m
From: rohit verma
Subject: [LTP] Reg:Unzip01 Test Not Working Correctly
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:25:21 +0530
> Hi,
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Unzip01-Test-Not-Working-Correctly-td22575152.html
>
> Please confirm if the bug related to unzip01 mentioned at the above URL is
> fixed in ltp-full-200
Hi,
http://www.nabble.com/Unzip01-Test-Not-Working-Correctly-td22575152.html
Please confirm if the bug related to unzip01 mentioned at the above URL is
fixed in ltp-full-20090331release.
I have got the same error in 20090331-release.
Regards,
Rohit
-
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 08:50 +0800, Jianjun Kong wrote:
> Hello, When I compile the test case. Face those problem:
> -
> make[6]: Leaving directory
> `/home/linux/kernel/ltp-full-20090331/testcases/kernel/sy
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 09:43 +0200, Németh Márton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is v4l-test 0.11 patch for LTP.
>
> Changes:
>
> - Test cases added for VIDIOC_G_OUTPUT, VIDIOC_S_OUTPUT,
>VIDIOC_G_FMT, VIDIOC_G_SLICED_VBI_CAP, VIDIOC_QUERYMENU;
> - Cleaned up ret and errno variable names;
> - Separ
26 matches
Mail list logo
