Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/5] tracing/events: add startup tests for events

Thanks Frederic. We will definitely look into and see how we can utilize this. Will get back to you for any issue(s). Regards-- Subrata On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:18:32PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > From: Steven Rostedt > > > >

Re: [LTP] change owner

Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Subrata and Mike, > > is there any reason why is in code multiple copies of change_owner (+ > script) file? > It will be better to have it in one location for all cases and clean > Makefile. > > What do you think? How about getting rid of it altogether[1]? Regards Ji

[LTP] statvfs -> f_bavail

Hi All, don't you know what is the description of f_bavail in struct statvfs? On my system I am getting zero for this entry that's why fsync02 failed. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0

Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/5] tracing/events: add startup tests for events

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:18:32PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt > > As events start to become popular, and the new way to add tracing > infrastructure into ftrace, it is important to catch any problems > that might happen with a mistake in the TRACE_EVENT macro. > > This p

[LTP] change owner

Hi Subrata and Mike, is there any reason why is in code multiple copies of change_owner (+ script) file? It will be better to have it in one location for all cases and clean Makefile. What do you think? Thanks, Michal [r...@monstr testcases]# find -name "change_owner*" ./kernel/syscalls/fchown

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] compiling errors fixing

right. Thanks for the fixing. CAI Qian wrote: > From: Yi Xu > Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] compiling errors fixing > Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:24:21 +0200 > >> Signed-off-by: Yi Xu > > NACK. I can't see there is any error, but compilation warnings, > > gcc -g -O2 -I../../../../../include -Walla

Re: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization

Thanks. Regards-- Subrata On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 23:36 +0800, CAI Qian wrote: > From: Subrata Modak > Subject: Re: [LTP] fork05 test case fails due to optimization > Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:37:23 +0530 > > > On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 13:37 +0800, CAI Qian wrote: > >> From: CAI Qian > >> Subject:

Re: [LTP] Issue in runcc in network-lib6 module

Thanks Cai. Regards-- Subrata On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 23:33 +0800, CAI Qian wrote: > From: Subrata Modak > Subject: Re: [LTP] Issue in runcc in network-lib6 module > Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:59:05 +0530 > > > On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 23:05 -0700, CAI Qian wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> --- On Fri, 4/10

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Ar01: Disable Two Test Cases

Applied. Regards-- Subrata On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 23:56 +0800, CAI Qian wrote: > Hi, > > It turns out that -s option does not has any effect for binutils ar, > which makes related test cases invalid in ar01 test. Nick Clifton > replied in the bug report, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi