On 21:13 Fri 07 Aug 2009, naresh kamboju wrote:
> ltp-fix-mq_send_5-1.patch
FYI, this attached patch uses Windows ^M line endings.
Cheers,
Brandon
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Repor
On 13:29 Fri 07 Aug 2009, naresh kamboju wrote:
> I have noticed issues for patch applied on 12-Dec-2008.
> Because it is fixing the mq_send/5-1.c problem, but at the same time
> patch is affecting the building of few test cases in the same
> directory.
> I have listed the build log before and afte
I see the same problem as Michal on x86 and ppc32(85xx) on kernel 2.6.28/2.6.27
respectively.
-Original Message-
From: Subrata Modak [mailto:subr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 5:41 AM
To: michal.si...@petalogix.com
Cc: LTP List; Manas Kumar Nayak
Subject: Re: [LTP
Hi Fan,
please give your comments on this issue.
It is glibc and kernel issue discussions.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/197191
Is this info is up to the date?
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/mmap.html
I did not find mmap (3) in kernel man pages.
http://www.kernel.org/doc/m
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:29 +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
>> Hi Brandon Philips,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:52 PM, naresh kamboju
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
>> >> On 12:35 Tue 30 Ju
I see these two test cases are failing on PowerPC target (ppc440) as shown
in output file, but they are listed as PASS in log file of the LTP :
Target : PowerPC (ppc440)
Kernel: Linux-2.6.29
LTP Version : ltp-full-20090731
LTP output file :
#
1. add_key01
<<>>
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Commit "move leading __NR_ to script to make all the .in files simpler"
> > accidentally removed all plus signs surrounded by spaces from the syscall
> > definition files for hppa/powerpc{,6
On Aug 6, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Kumar
> Gala wrote:
>> I'm seeing this on fedora 11 on ppc64:
>>
>> make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/ltp/testcases/network/ipv6'
>> make[3]: Entering directory `/root/ltp/testcases/network/lib6'
>> cc -Wall -
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 15:16 +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed UNTESTED behavior with sched_setparam/26-1.c test case
> under open_posix_testsuite.
>
> Test needs to be executed as non-root user.
> So I have changed user id from root to non-root user by adding
> set_nonroot()
Hi Raj,
Including few more people for review. My few nitpicks below.
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 16:49 +0530, Rajasekhar Duddu wrote:
> Hi, I have developed a testcase for CPU Accounting Controller which is
> used to group tasks using cgroups and account the CPU usage of these groups
> of tasks.
>
>
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:49 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Commit "move leading __NR_ to script to make all the .in files simpler"
> accidentally removed all plus signs surrounded by spaces from the syscall
> definition files for hppa/powerpc{,64}/s390{,x}/sh/sparc{,64}, breaking the
> build l
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:29 +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
> Hi Brandon Philips,
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:52 PM, naresh kamboju
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
> >> On 12:35 Tue 30 Jun 2009, naresh kamboju wrote:
> >>> I have noticed some issue with
Michal,
My x86_32 behaves fine with this Syscall test, may be because it is
2.6.18 kernel as henry said.
$ uname -a
Linux 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 29 13:16:12 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
$ ./testcases/bin/utimes01
utimes010 TINFO : (case00) START
utimes010 TINFO : E:0,10
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 19:21 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Henry Yei wrote:
> > Yes, I had just noticed this as well. Since it was "passing", it took
> > awhile to spot.
> >
> > Returning pass even with tst_resm(TFAIL,.. Being called must have something
> > to do
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:52 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 13:33 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > I get the following compile error:
> >
> > make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fstat'
> > make[4]: Entering directory `/root/ltp/testcases/
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:27 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> rohit verma wrote:
> > PFA the patch for waitid02
> >
> I can confirm that this patch fixed problem with waitid02.
> It is just confirmation - I haven't look at style/patch in detail - just
> works and pass on Microblaze
>
> Subrate: Do
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:09 +0530, Sharyathi Nagesh wrote:
> Subrata
> Resending the patch, after the modification. Let me know if this is
> acceptable
> Thanks
> Yeehaw
It fails to Apply:
patching file testcases/kernel/syscalls/chmod/chmod05.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 240 with fuzz 2.
patchi
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 14:29 +0100, Kleen, Andi wrote:
> >> 3) Sign off from Huang Ying , or, the
> >concerned Authors,
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Huang Ying
> >You can add that to the patch.
>
> And Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen
Thank you too.
> (wrote also some early code)
>
> One thing I should ad
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 21:39 +0530, naresh kamboju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In addition to the below Link discussion
>
> Date: 16 Jul 2009
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07506.html
>
> patch is not yet committed to LTP CVs.
I am a bit perplexed by all these links. Can y
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 09:18 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 01:55 +0800, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Hi Huang Ying,
> >
> > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 16:25 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > Hi Huang Ying,
> > >
> > > >On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:56 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > >Hi, All,
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 14:48 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 18:55 +0800, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Hi Huang Ying,
> >
> > >On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:56 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > >Hi, All,
> > >
> > > We are working on a test suite to test the Linux kernel MCE handling
> > > logi
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 11:56 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting fault on x86/Microblaze for ppoll. It is run only one
> testcase than ends.
> Have you ever met with this problem?
I have a different problem however on my x86_32 machine:
$ ./testcases/bin/ppoll01
ppoll01 0 TIN
Hi, I have developed a testcase for CPU Accounting Controller which is
used to group tasks using cgroups and account the CPU usage of these groups of
tasks.
Here I am posting the patch, please review the patch and let me know if
it needs any changes, thanks.
diff -rupN
ltp-full-20090731//tes
Commit "move leading __NR_ to script to make all the .in files simpler"
accidentally removed all plus signs surrounded by spaces from the syscall
definition files for hppa/powerpc{,64}/s390{,x}/sh/sparc{,64}, breaking the
build like:
fstatat01.c: In function ‘main’:
fstatat01.c:126
Hi Brandon Philips,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:52 PM, naresh kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Brandon Philips wrote:
>> On 12:35 Tue 30 Jun 2009, naresh kamboju wrote:
>>> I have noticed some issue with your patch dated on 12-Dec-2008.
>>> I want conform the problem and root cause
Hi Henry,
> Michal,
>
> This is a known issue. If you look at the manpages it states the following
> under the BUGS section:
>
> Linux is not careful to distinguish between the EACCES and EPERM
> error returns. On the other hand, POSIX.1-2001 is buggy in its
> error description for utim
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:24 AM, wrote:
>>> From: Michal Simek
>>>
>>> I added support for testing ramfs and add together
>>> tests for nfs, tmpfs and ramfs.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> I'm looking at this code to solve another
27 matches
Mail list logo
