Re: [LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Shwetabh
Hi Garett, There is one possible problem with the current solution provided by Maxin. The patch takes care only of cpuhotplug tests. However, judging by the number of files that are missing in /opt/ltp/testcases, it is quite possible that many other tests might have been broken. So, perhaps a g

[LTP] Is there another method to download?

2010-03-03 Thread Mitani
Hi, I tried to get source by using GIT. But It failed with following message: # git clone git://ltp.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/ltp/ltp-dev.git ltp-dev Initialized empty Git repository in /home/mitani/wk/ltp-dev/.git/ fatal: Unable to look up ltp.git.sourceforge.net (port 9418) (Temp

Re: [LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:16:47PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Maxin John wrote: >> >> > Hi Shwetabh, >> > >> >> 3. Went to /opt/ltp directory and tried to execute cpuhotplug test: >> >> [r...@localhost ~]

Re: [LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Rishikesh K Rajak
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:16:47PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Maxin John wrote: > > > Hi Shwetabh, > > > >> 3. Went to /opt/ltp directory and tried to execute cpuhotplug test: > >> [r...@localhost ~]# cd /opt/ltp/ > >> [r...@localhost ltp]# ./runltp -f cpuhotplug >

[LTP] [PATCH-v3] RTC Device Driver Tests

2010-03-03 Thread Silesh C V
Hi, Here is the new version of the RTC device driver tests.This is taken against next branch of ltp git. Rishi, Can you test this patch on the machine on which the tests got stuck earlier? Thanks, Silesh - >From 0296ea1ee1d76f977cbe337da5b639 4d9034e625 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sile

Re: [LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mar 3, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Maxin John wrote: > Hi Shwetabh, > >> 3. Went to /opt/ltp directory and tried to execute cpuhotplug test: >> [r...@localhost ~]# cd /opt/ltp/ >> [r...@localhost ltp]# ./runltp -f cpuhotplug >> > > Please find attached the quick 'n' dirty patch > (cpu_hotplugin_makefile

Re: [LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Maxin John
Hi Shwetabh, > 3. Went to /opt/ltp directory and tried to execute cpuhotplug test: > [r...@localhost ~]# cd /opt/ltp/ > [r...@localhost ltp]# ./runltp -f cpuhotplug > Please find attached the quick 'n' dirty patch (cpu_hotplugin_makefile.patch) to execute cpuhotplugin test. I have observed that t

Re: [LTP] LTP's filecaps test gives false positive results

2010-03-03 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com): > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:25:23AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:35 AM, "Serge E. Hallyn" wrote: > >> > >> > Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com): > >> >>

Re: [LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Shwetabh
Hi Rishi, Here is the information you needed: - Installation Steps: 1. Downloaded LTP's Feb 2010 Stable build from ltp.sourceforge.net 2. Extracted/compiled using following commands: tar -xzf ltp-full-20100228.tgz cd ltp-full-20100228 ./configure make make install 3. Went to /opt/ltp directory an

Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131

2010-03-03 Thread Sachin Sant
Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > >> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball >> from Feb. >> > > Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file > once you compiled and build, reading f

Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: >>> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball >>> from Feb. >> >> Actually the script design is

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Synchronization required before release the lock: sem_post/8-1.c

2010-03-03 Thread naresh kamboju
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:49 AM, naresh kamboju > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:33 AM, naresh kamboju >>> wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak w

Re: [LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Rishikesh K Rajak
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:05:43PM +0530, Shwetabh wrote: > Hi, > Hi Shwetabh, Few queries: - Tell us the complete steps of execution/compiling - OS version ? - automake & autoconf version ? - Arch ? Thanks -Rishi > In recent ltp releases, I see quite a few test cases breaking s

Re: [LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
Hi, On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Shwetabh wrote: > > In recent ltp releases, I see quite a few test cases breaking since > their required tools > are not being copied over to /opt/ltp/testcases/. I believe this > behaviour started since > ltp started compiling and copying the files to /opt/ltp

Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: >> Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball >> from Feb. > > Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file > once you compiled

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Synchronization required before release the lock: sem_post/8-1.c

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:49 AM, naresh kamboju wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:33 AM, naresh kamboju >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak >>> wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:18:50AM -0800, Garrett Coop

[LTP] Missing test tools in recent ltp builds

2010-03-03 Thread Shwetabh
Hi, In recent ltp releases, I see quite a few test cases breaking since their required tools are not being copied over to /opt/ltp/testcases/. I believe this behaviour started since ltp started compiling and copying the files to /opt/ltp. Here is an example: <>--- remove test cases

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Synchronization required before release the lock: sem_post/8-1.c

2010-03-03 Thread naresh kamboju
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:33 AM, naresh kamboju > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:18:50AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: Uh, hold on a sec before we call it good... >>>

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Synchronization required before release the lock: sem_post/8-1.c

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:33 AM, naresh kamboju wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:18:50AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> Uh, hold on a sec before we call it good... >> >> oh ok, holiding on for bit. >> >> Naresh, can you please send

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Synchronization required before release the lock: sem_post/8-1.c

2010-03-03 Thread naresh kamboju
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:18:50AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Uh, hold on a sec before we call it good... > > oh ok, holiding on for bit. > > Naresh, can you please send a patch with incorporating garret's comment > ? +        /*

[LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131

2010-03-03 Thread Sachin Sant
Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball from Feb. The Version file still contains 20100131. :/home/sachin/work # cat ltp-full-20100228/Version LTP-20100131 :/home/sachin/work # Should this be 20100228 ? Thanks -Sachin -- - Sachin Sant

Re: [LTP] Version file from Feb LTP release still contains 20100131

2010-03-03 Thread Rishikesh K Rajak
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:08:00PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > Not a major issue, but noticed something with latest LTP tarball > from Feb. Actually the script design is like that, it will update the version file once you compiled and build, reading from Changelog. Can you confirm if you are not

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Fix memcg test scripts

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Sachin Sant wrote: > Inspite of memcg kernel support being available, memcg_[functional|regression > |stress] test script fails to execute with message > > "Either Kernel does not support for memory resource controller or feature not > enabled" > "Skipping all memc

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Synchronization required before release the lock: sem_post/8-1.c

2010-03-03 Thread Rishikesh K Rajak
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:18:50AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Uh, hold on a sec before we call it good... oh ok, holiding on for bit. Naresh, can you please send a patch with incorporating garret's comment ? Thanks Rishi > -- Thanks & Regards Rishi LTP Maintainer IBM, LTC, Bangalore Please

Re: [LTP] LTP's filecaps test gives false positive results

2010-03-03 Thread Rishikesh K Rajak
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:14:12AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > I'll update the tests this weekend, but I would like it if someone > test the tests on an outdated distro (RHEL 4.x?) once I provide a > patch to ensure that nothing's being regressed. Based on some really > simple inspection it

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Makefile fix for 'createfile.c' build in network/tcp_cmds/echo

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Maxin John wrote: > Hi, > > I have observed that the 'createfile.c' in > testcases/network/tcp_cmds/echo directory is not getting compiled and > installed during the LTP build. The "echo_createfile.patch" makes the > necessary changes in the Makefile. Good catch! T

Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Synchronization required before release the lock: sem_post/8-1.c

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
Uh, hold on a sec before we call it good... On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:30:42AM +0530, naresh kamboju wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:38:20PM +0530, naresh kamboju wr

Re: [LTP] LTP's filecaps test gives false positive results

2010-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:25:23AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Mar 2, 2010, at 9:35 AM, "Serge E. Hallyn" wrote: >> >> > Quoting Garrett Cooper (yaneg...@gmail.com): >> >> >> >> That would be from me; I do that via autoconf and the