On Apr 26, 11:52am, gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com (Wanlong Gao) wrote:
-- Subject: [BUG] I'm reporting a bug about file
| Do you think this is a bug, or I missed something?
Bug.
| Can you file command guys give me some idea about this?
Mine says (5.11):
t.c: C source, ASCII text
christos
---
- Original Message -
> From: "Caspar Zhang"
> To: "Christopher Yeoh"
> Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, "Jan Stancek"
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 May, 2012 3:00:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Simple tests for cross memory attach
> (process_vm_[readv|writev] syscalls)
> Hi Chris, thank
>
> Oh, sorry I missed.
>
> Any other comments?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Wanlong Gao
>
Well it's totally ok so long the misunderstanding is solved :)
Well that's all for now i think, unless there is some other
problem with the current patches?
Thanks for your patience.
--
Marios Makris
---
On 05/15/2012 08:36 PM, Marioh mrs wrote:
>>
>> At least you can take a look at here ./testcases/kernel/fs/doio/iogen.c
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Wanlong Gao
>>
>
> Hello again,
>
> This file usages have been replaced in the 2nd patch:
> [PATCH 2/3] Renamed /lib/str_to_bytes.c and /include str_to bytes.h
>
> At least you can take a look at here ./testcases/kernel/fs/doio/iogen.c
>
> Thanks,
> Wanlong Gao
>
Hello again,
This file usages have been replaced in the 2nd patch:
[PATCH 2/3] Renamed /lib/str_to_bytes.c and /include str_to bytes.h
Below i have pasted the diff from the patch only for that
On 05/15/2012 07:51 PM, Marioh mrs wrote:
> On 14 May 2012 10:24, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>
>>
>> But Marios,
>>
>> In the previous patch, you changed the library function
>> from str_to_bytes to bytes_by_prefix, if you'd prefer
>> the latter name, please also replace the using of str_to_bytes
>> wit
On 14 May 2012 10:24, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>
>
> But Marios,
>
> In the previous patch, you changed the library function
> from str_to_bytes to bytes_by_prefix, if you'd prefer
> the latter name, please also replace the using of str_to_bytes
> with the new name, if not, it'll not be compiled.
>
> Th
On 05/15/2012 07:16 PM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 06:47 PM, Zhouping Liu wrote:
>> inside oom0[2|4], ksm0[2|4] cases, they are running under
>> numa system, and allocte memory in the second numa node,
>> set nodemask 2, which indicates all memory allocated in
>> node1, but when a numa sy
On 05/15/2012 06:47 PM, Zhouping Liu wrote:
> inside oom0[2|4], ksm0[2|4] cases, they are running under
> numa system, and allocte memory in the second numa node,
> set nodemask 2, which indicates all memory allocated in
> node1, but when a numa system don't have node1, these cases
> will failed, s
inside oom0[2|4], ksm0[2|4] cases, they are running under
numa system, and allocte memory in the second numa node,
set nodemask 2, which indicates all memory allocated in
node1, but when a numa system don't have node1, these cases
will failed, such like the box, available nodes: (0,2,4,7)
[root@h
10 matches
Mail list logo