On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 02:45:27PM +0400, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
> In LTP we have a test - numa01.sh
> (https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/numa/numa01.sh)
numactl has similar tests
>
> In general, this script does something like:
> * numastat > /tmp/
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Caspar Zhang wrote:
> Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any objections
> from you by today.
Fine for me. Copying Gong Chen who did most of the mce-test work recently
too.
-Andi
>
>
> On 03/09/2012 08:25 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> >
Thanks for fixing that!
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportuni
I ran configure, which seems to spend 99% of its time
checking for stuff that is always there on any Linux,
and after that I just get
# make
make: `testcases/realtime/configure' is up to date.
#
Can we please have the old Makefiles back?
Thanks,
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for
Subrata, Lee,
I was looking at
ltp/testcases/kernel/hotplug/memory_hotplug/
in LTP and it seems to be just a outdated copy of Lee's memtoy NUMA tester,
which
does not really test any memory hotadd, just NUMA policies.
The ChangeLog just says
CPU and MEMORY HOTPLUG test cases picked up from
When running ltp 20081231 msgctl10 on 2.6.28/opensuse 11.0
generates an endless zombie loop. I found that system had load
average 1886 and was somewhat unresponsive.
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com
--
Check out the new
And I have one request:
LTP used to have a nice download link to the tarball
of the latest release on http://ltp.sourceforge.net
At some point this disappeared and one now has to
navigate to the project page.
I often install LTP on systems and they typically
don't have X, so I do the download w
Hi,
I needed the following patches to make LTP 20081231 build
on a 16 thread opensuse 11.0 system.
The first two are because my system doesn't have sys/capability.h,
but surprisingly these programs build fine even without it.
The last hunk fixes a makefile dependency bug that broke
the build her
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 04:45:09PM +0530, Sharyathi Nagesh wrote:
> more error checks, but if it is moving vsyscall way I dont think there
> is any scope for error checking. I will remove this test
> >
> >More interesting would be to test on more CPUs for example,
> >as in extending getcpu1 to cy
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 03:19:05PM +0530, Sharyathi Nagesh wrote:
> Hi
> >
> >Sorry for the late feedback. I don't understand what you're
> >testing in getcpu2 -- getcpu() has no input arguments (except
> >for the cache). So why do you expect it to fail with 0xff?
> >
> >-Andi
> Andi
> getcpu2 is
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:59:53AM +0530, Sharyathi Nagesh wrote:
> Hi
> I have developed 2 test cases for getcpu() system call, Test cases
> check minimal functionality of getcpu(). These test cases have a
> requirement of kernel 2.6.20 and above and glibc 2.6 and above.
> Currently
his check seems unfortunate because the syscall might be backported.
>
> Andi, this can be Ok for the time being. Actually we do this for lot of
> tests in LTP.
Then it's wrong everywhere.
> Meanwhile, when the syscall gets backported we can reduce
> this value as well.
Better fix it in advance
> +void
> +verify_pages_on_nodes(int *status, unsigned int num, int *nodes)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> + if (status[i] != nodes[i]) {
> + tst_resm(TFAIL, "page %d on node %d, "
> + "expected on
Old kernel includes don't necessarily have IN_MOVE_SELF
-Andi
diff -u testcases/kernel/syscalls/inotify/inotify02.c-o
testcases/kernel/syscalls/inotify/inotify02.c
--- testcases/kernel/syscalls/inotify/inotify02.c-o 2007-10-25
12:04:58.0 +0200
+++ testcases/kernel/syscalls/inotify/
Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> New GCOV and LCOV Packages(Patches) has been released and the same can
> picked up from:
> https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3382
> The older releases has been moved to LCOV-Archives and Gcov-Kernel-Archives.
Have you considered sub
15 matches
Mail list logo
