both the implementations of xargs.
>
>
> Attached the patch here.
>
> Thanks
>
> Suzuki
Just noticed this thread. Looks good, thanks!
Acked-by: Matt Helsley
>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K P
>
> Index: ltp/testscripts/test_fs_bind.sh
> =
cmp 2 6 27 ; then
+ echo recompile your kernel with CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y.
+ else
+ echo recompile your kernel with
CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y.
+ fi
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
---
like this should be 12.
Why not just use the subsystem names both to iterate over and to print
out? Then it will be a little clearer what test has[n't] passed.
e.g.:
SUBSYSTEMS=( debug cpuset ns cpu cpuacct memory debug,debug freezer \
devices nonexistent none all )
Then when
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:59:25PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 11:24 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:22:05PM +0800, nobuhiro wrote:
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: nobuhiro
> > > ---
> > > test
CFLAGS += -Wall
> CPPFLAGS += -I../../../../include
> -LDLIBS += -L../../../../lib -lltp -lrt
> +LDLIBS += -L../../../../lib -lltp -lrt -lpthread
Same here.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
___
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:10:36AM +0200, Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:51:12 +0200, Matt Helsley
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:09:16PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Thursday 02 July 2009 16:32:53 Matt Helsley wrote:
>>&g
> +# autoconf. Haven't figured it out yet...
> +#
> +ifeq ($(strip $(prefix)),)
> +prefix = /opt/ltp
> +endif
I thought the point was not having to run autoconf to get the default
build and install via Makefiles.
> +
> +datarootdir = @datarootdir@
> +
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:09:16PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 16:32:53 Matt Helsley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:35:46PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > in general, converting sh to bash is a bad idea as it can cause issues
> >
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:18:58PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I understand what you're trying to accomplish, but part of the
> point behind the current design with the Makefile system was in fact
> for it to be run without intervention from autotools. Hence, the
> directions noted in INSTAL
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:35:46PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 05:05:32 Matt Helsley wrote:
> > As best I can tell these tests do not use true sh syntax -- they use bash
> > syntax. Rather than bother hunting down all the bash-isms just convert
> >
As best I can tell these tests do not use true sh syntax -- they use bash
syntax. Rather than bother hunting down all the bash-isms just convert
them to use bash as their interpretter.
Also found with my fedora 10 KVM image.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
Cc: Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Poornima Nayak
Cc
Fixup some non-sh syntax which seems to trigger problems on my fedora 10
KVM image.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
Cc: Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Poornima Nayak
Cc: Sudhir Kumar
Cc: Veerendra C
Cc: Munipradeep
Cc: l...@list.sourceforge.net
---
testcases/kernel/containers/netns/parentns.sh |2
Use ip -V to exclude the network namespace testcases since they require
version ("snapshot") ss080725 or higher to set the network namespace of
interfaces used for testing.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
Signed-off-by: Sachin P. Sant
Cc: Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Poornima Nayak
Cc: Sudhir
Report the version of the ip route tools in ver_linux with ip -V. The
version is important to the netns testcases for example. Since it would
be useful for other testcases add it to the ver_linux script.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
Cc: Daniel Lezcano
Cc: Poornima Nayak
Cc: Sudhir Kumar
Cc
"describing" the test are
totally incorrect -- they appear to be a copy-paste artifact. So I
updated them.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
---
runtest/commands |2
testcases/commands/unzip/Makefile | 33 ---
testcases/commands/unzip/unzip_
Fix spelling and grammar nits.
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
---
runltp|2 +-
testcases/commands/gzip/gzip_tests.sh |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: ltp/testcases/commands/gzip/gzip_tests.sh
Review of these test source files suggests that absolutley no capability APIs
are in use. I suspect these #ifdefs were added because the original
tests had unnecessarily included sys/capability.h
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
---
testcases/kernel/containers/pidns/pidns14.c | 17
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:30:22AM -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> These testcases cover the basic functionality of the kernel cgroup
> freezer controller described in the kernel's
> Documentation/cgroups/freezer-subsystem.txt file. Briefly:
>
> The freezer subsystem in the cgrou
se that means this script has to keep code describing which
version of which distro used which tool with which package name(s). This
kind of supports Garret Cooper's point...
More comments interleaved below.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
> --
>
> diff -uprN ltp-full-20090131.orig/i
asapi_01.c
-L../../../lib runcc.a -lltp -lpthread -o asapi_01
cc: runcc.a: No such file or directory
This patch fixes the problem by properly expressing the build depdency
between the TARGET objects and runcc.a
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
---
Changlog:
v2:
Rely on the implicit
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:06 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2009, at 15:34, Matt Helsley wrote:
>
> > The dependency description in testcases/network/lib6/Makefile breaks
> > parallel builds:
> >
> >make autoconf
> >
asapi_01.c
-L../../../lib runcc.a -lltp -lpthread -o asapi_01
cc: runcc.a: No such file or directory
This patch fixes the problem by properly expressing the build depdency
between the TARGET objects and runcc.a
Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley
---
--- ltp-full-20081231/testcases/network
s.
Right. 8 & 9 were for my own testing purposes and got sent out
accidentally. Please feel free to ignore them.
Cheers,
-Matt
> Regards--
> Subrata
>
> On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:34 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (fixup-process-events-conn
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 19:50 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > Rishi
>
> I'd guess LTPROOT is being setup by the connectors test scripts
> improperly. Please give this patch a try -- I haven't tested it myself
> yet.
>
> The patch does some additional
S
> LTP Version: LTP-20080831
>
> ===
>
> Thanks
>
> Rishi
I'd guess LTPROOT is being setup by the connectors test scripts
improperly. Please give this patch a try -- I haven't test
Hi Rishi,
When I ran the August intermediate release on a single-cpu i386 machine
I was not able to reproduce your results. I did:
$ make
$ make install
$ ./runltp -f fs_bind
$ ./runltp -f fs_bind > run.out > run.err
$ grep PASSED run.out | wc -l
90
$ wc -l run.err
0
$ grep -i brok run.* | wc -l
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:12 +0530, Rishikesh K Rajak wrote:
> > > > Is this is an expected behaviour ? i should not run two times, i also
> > > > tried with different combination, individually also it is failing
> now.
> >
> > It's not expected behavior. It should be able to run twice.
>
> Matt, c
addr_nl));
> + if (ret == -1) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "failed to bind socket\n");
> + exit(1);
> + }
In subsequent email echanges Li and Subrata wrote:
> Subrata Modak 写道:
> > Li,
> >
> > Will you be resendin
> >##
> > +## This program is free software; you can redistribute it and#or modify
> >##
> > +## it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >##
> > +#
see i
> ran on RHEL 4 kernel.
>
> Thanks
> Rishi
Hi Rishi,
You could try this patch and see if it solves the problem. I may not
have a chance to test if for a while.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
Subject: Test kernel version in all fs_bind tests
Distribute tst_kvercm
are present in the
output?
I'll work on a patch adding kernel version comparison to each testcase
as that will help folks who want to run the individual testxx scripts.
In the meantime, only basic --bind and --move mounts are expected to
work on that kernel; none of the --make-* mount
quot; and "makedir" are too
generic to place in the global testcases/bin directory -- hence the
scripts need "${FS_BIND_ROOT}/bin" in your PATH.
Keep in mind that depending on the test results the scripts may leave
mounts behind (though I tried to prevent this as best I cou
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 14:13 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 09:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Matt Helsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > >
on is best?
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse01
34 matches
Mail list logo
