Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-04-13 Thread Subrata Modak
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 07:09 +0800, CAI Qian wrote: > From: CAI Qian > Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case > Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:46:37 +0800 (CST) > > > From: CAI Qian > > Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case > > Date: Wed, 1

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-04-12 Thread CAI Qian
From: CAI Qian Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:46:37 +0800 (CST) > From: CAI Qian > Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:11:22 +0800 (CST) > >>>> So, it was working before when it was ori

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-04-01 Thread CAI Qian
From: CAI Qian Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:11:22 +0800 (CST) >>> So, it was working before when it was originally written that "ar -s" >>> can restore the file size to that before the strip run? Do you mean it >&g

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-03-17 Thread Subrata Modak
Hi Robbie, Good to see you back on supporting LTP :-) Regards-- Subrata On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 15:34 -0500, Robbie Williamson wrote: > On 03/16/2009 09:05 PM, CAI Qian wrote: > > From: Robbie Williamson > > Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case > > Date: Mon,

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-03-17 Thread CAI Qian
From: Robbie Williamson Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:34:25 -0500 > On 03/16/2009 09:05 PM, CAI Qian wrote: >> From: Robbie Williamson >> Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case >> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:29:48 -05

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-03-17 Thread Robbie Williamson
On 03/16/2009 09:05 PM, CAI Qian wrote: > From: Robbie Williamson > Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:29:48 -0500 > >> Fixed this testcase. I'm not sure why it was written the way it was. It >> could >> be that th

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-03-16 Thread CAI Qian
From: Robbie Williamson Subject: Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:29:48 -0500 > Fixed this testcase. I'm not sure why it was written the way it was. It > could > be that the 'ar' command has changed over the past years, making test

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-03-16 Thread Robbie Williamson
Fixed this testcase. I'm not sure why it was written the way it was. It could be that the 'ar' command has changed over the past years, making test #17 incorrect...which sometimes happens. In any case, I uploaded the changes to CVS, and the test FAILS as it apparently should. :/ -Robbie On 03/

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-03-16 Thread Subrata Modak
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:31 PM, CAI Qian wrote: > From: CAI Qian > Subject: Help Need for Ar01 Test Case > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:32:17 +0800 (CST) > > > Hi Robbie, > > > > I got delevery failure for Robbie's email address, > > Your message > >Subject: Help Need for Ar01 Test Case > >

Re: [LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-03-16 Thread CAI Qian
From: CAI Qian Subject: Help Need for Ar01 Test Case Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:32:17 +0800 (CST) > Hi Robbie, > I got delevery failure for Robbie's email address, Your message Subject: Help Need for Ar01 Test Case was not delivered to: robb...@us.ibm.com because: User rob

[LTP] Help Need for Ar01 Test Case

2009-03-16 Thread CAI Qian
Hi Robbie, I may need your help to understand ar01 test case under testcases/commands/ade/ar/. The following test code may fail, and I don't understand what it does, # The -s causes regeneration of symbol table even if a symbol table exists. # CODE rm -rf $TCtmp/lib.a;cd $TCdat ar -cr $