On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> I'll happily put it up at github, but if James still doesn't mind putting
> it up at kernel.org, that seems more official.
It's probably better if you have full access to maintain it.
You could use selinuxproject.org (like SE-Android does).
--
James M
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 14:16 +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > Is this still valid? I'm having troubles cloning from there.
> > >
> > > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tests/selinux-testsuite
> > > Initialized empty Git repository in /us
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 14:16 +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > Is this still valid? I'm having troubles cloning from there.
> >
> > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tests/selinux-testsuite
> > Initialized empty Git repository in /usr/src/selinux-testsuite/.git/
> > fatal: The remote end hu
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 15:02 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
> > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 14:16 +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > > Is this still valid? I'm having troubles cloning from there.
> > > >
> > > > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/te
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 15:02 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
> > > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 14:16 +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > > Is this still valid? I'm having troubles cloning from there.
>
Quoting Stephen Smalley (s...@tycho.nsa.gov):
> On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 14:16 +0100, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> > Hi!
> > > Is this still valid? I'm having troubles cloning from there.
> > >
> > > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tests/selinux-testsuite
> > > Initialized empty Git repository in /us
Hi!
> Is this still valid? I'm having troubles cloning from there.
>
> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tests/selinux-testsuite
> Initialized empty Git repository in /usr/src/selinux-testsuite/.git/
> fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
>
> and also I can't see it listed here: http:/
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Smalley"
> To: "ltp-list"
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 3:08:47 PM
> Subject: [LTP] selinux-testsuite has moved
> The selinux testsuite has been moved to a standalone testsuite
> separate from the ltp. Y
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> I'd vote for the first option. The second one is harder than you may
>> think given differences in test harness and layout, and the third one
>> seems unlikely at this point. Just redirect to
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tests/selin
Hi!
> I'd vote for the first option. The second one is harder than you may
> think given differences in test harness and layout, and the third one
> seems unlikely at this point. Just redirect to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tests/selinux-testsuite
Okay.
Let's wait for about a week or two and
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> Okay, let's renew the conversation now. What we have:
>
> * selinux is outdated in LTP and maintained elsewhere
> * and the selinux is not well integrated with LTP
>
> And my points are:
>
> * we don't have manpower to integrate seli
Hi!
Okay, let's renew the conversation now. What we have:
* selinux is outdated in LTP and maintained elsewhere
* and the selinux is not well integrated with LTP
And my points are:
* we don't have manpower to integrate selinux with LTP
* it's not good if testers use outdated selinux from LTP
An
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 12:38 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:32 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > At present we see no benefit, only cost, to maintaining the selinux
> > testsuite in the ltp as it is regularly broken by unrelated changes
> > elsewhere in the ltp and as it is not t
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 09:32 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> At present we see no benefit, only cost, to maintaining the selinux
> testsuite in the ltp as it is regularly broken by unrelated changes
> elsewhere in the ltp and as it is not truly integrated into the ltp (you
> have to perform separat
On Apr 25, 2011, at 6:32 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 02:13 +0530, Shubham Goyal wrote:
>> On Friday 22 April 2011 06:38 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A recent posting on lkml noted that the selinux testsuite in ltp doesn't
>>> work anymore. As no one seems to
On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 02:13 +0530, Shubham Goyal wrote:
> On Friday 22 April 2011 06:38 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > A recent posting on lkml noted that the selinux testsuite in ltp doesn't
> > work anymore. As no one seems to be maintaining it in the ltp, I'd
> > suggest just removi
On Friday 22 April 2011 06:38 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A recent posting on lkml noted that the selinux testsuite in ltp doesn't
> work anymore. As no one seems to be maintaining it in the ltp, I'd
> suggest just removing it entirely. You may want to leave a README.MOVED
> or similar fi
Hi,
A recent posting on lkml noted that the selinux testsuite in ltp doesn't
work anymore. As no one seems to be maintaining it in the ltp, I'd
suggest just removing it entirely. You may want to leave a README.MOVED
or similar file pointing to the new location, e.g.:
The selinux testsuite has be
gt; > > version as we have found it easier to set up, use, debug, and maintain.
> > >
> > > Thanks Stephen. Since you have maintained the Original-One Internally
> > > and have simultaneously contributed changes to the LTP-version of
> > > SELinux, i am depend
dalone testsuite and will not run within
> > > > > the
> > > > > ltp test harness. This testsuite is based on the original standalone
> > > > > selinux testsuite that was contributed by us to IBM to port to the
> > > > > LTP.
>
t harness. This testsuite is based on the original standalone
>> > > > selinux testsuite that was contributed by us to IBM to port to the LTP.
>> > > > We have internally maintained this testsuite in parallel to the ltp
>> > > > version as we have found
gt; > > version as we have found it easier to set up, use, debug, and maintain.
> > >
> > > Thanks Stephen. Since you have maintained the Original-One Internally
> > > and have simultaneously contributed changes to the LTP-version of
> > > SELinux, i am depend
sion as we have found it easier to set up, use, debug, and maintain.
> >
> > Thanks Stephen. Since you have maintained the Original-One Internally
> > and have simultaneously contributed changes to the LTP-version of
> > SELinux, i am depending on you/Serge/SELinux-Maili
i am depending on you/Serge/SELinux-Mailing-List-members to
> keep sending patches to LTP to update the LTP-version at regular
> intervals (off-course at your convenience ;-))
I think that will depend on whether there is some benefit to maintaining
the ltp version. We might derive some benefit
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:52 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:43 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Hi Serge,
> >
> > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 14:52 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > Just a little note to announce that the selinux testsuite is now up as a
> > > git tree at kern
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:43 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 14:52 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Just a little note to announce that the selinux testsuite is now up as a
> > git tree at kernel.org. You can fetch it using
> >
> > git clone git://git.kernel
Hi Serge,
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 14:52 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Just a little note to announce that the selinux testsuite is now up as a
> git tree at kernel.org. You can fetch it using
>
> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/tests/selinux-testsuite
Great. So, how far does it dif
:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > > > Thanks. With this, i think all the patches sent by you has been
> > > > > merged.
> > > > > Please let me know if i had missed something.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, looks correct. Thanks. A furt
:47 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > > > Thanks. With this, i think all the patches sent by you has been
> > > > > merged.
> > > > > Please let me know if i had missed something.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, looks correct. Thanks. A furt
think all the patches sent by you has been merged.
> > > > Please let me know if i had missed something.
> > >
> > > Yes, looks correct. Thanks. A further patch is below to address a
> > > comment from Serge.
> > >
> > > Update the ltp selin
let me know if i had missed something.
> >
> > Yes, looks correct. Thanks. A further patch is below to address a
> > comment from Serge.
> >
> > Update the ltp selinux testsuite README to note the requirement for the
> > libselinux headers and static library, and
. A further patch is below to address a
> comment from Serge.
>
> Update the ltp selinux testsuite README to note the requirement for the
> libselinux headers and static library, and provide URLs from which to
> obtain the SELinux core userland and reference policy if the base
>
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 15:41 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Some changes on top of the prior patches to enable the ltp selinux
> testsuite to run successfully on rhel5. Changes:
> - Fix the extraction of the release version to exclude
> Client/Server/etc.
> - Make the ioctl tes
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 16:12 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Add the type bounds test case to the runtest/selinux config so that it
> is executed as part of the ltp selinux testsuite. The test passes with
> a sufficiently recent kernel (>= 2.6.28) and checkpolicy, as in Fedora
>
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:09 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Update the ltp selinux testsuite README. Changes include:
> - Explain the two different locations of test policy up front and then
> use $POLICYDIR for subsequent references.
> - Expand and clarify the kernel configura
Update the ltp selinux testsuite README. Changes include:
- Explain the two different locations of test policy up front and then
use $POLICYDIR for subsequent references.
- Expand and clarify the kernel configuration options.
- Add a section summarizing the SELinux policy and userland
Add the type bounds test case to the runtest/selinux config so that it
is executed as part of the ltp selinux testsuite. The test passes with
a sufficiently recent kernel (>= 2.6.28) and checkpolicy, as in Fedora
11. If we want to avoid test failures on older kernels, we could add an
expli
Some changes on top of the prior patches to enable the ltp selinux
testsuite to run successfully on rhel5. Changes:
- Fix the extraction of the release version to exclude
Client/Server/etc.
- Make the ioctl test detect kernel version and adjust the test logic to
match the expected
38 matches
Mail list logo
