Hi!
Hi,
I'm still not entirely convinced about this test.
So am I. What about checking that we can do at least MAXNEST levels?
--
Cyril Hrubis
chru...@suse.cz
--
___
Hi Jan,
See in-line comments.
On 2015/8/11 16:05, Jan Stancek wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yuan Sun sunyu...@huawei.com
To: jstan...@redhat.com
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, 7 August, 2015 6:55:08 AM
Subject: [PATCH V2] container: new testcase pidns32
- Original Message -
From: Yuan Sun sunyu...@huawei.com
To: jstan...@redhat.com
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, 7 August, 2015 6:55:08 AM
Subject: [PATCH V2] container: new testcase pidns32
Kernel imposes a limit of 32 nested levels of pid namespaces.
Hi Jan and Cyril,
I have send a message in reply.
What is your opinion? If you convinced about this test, I will update
the code.
Or it is unnecessary to update the code.
Thanks.
Yuan
On 2015/8/11 16:33, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
Hi!
Hi,
I'm still not entirely convinced about
- Original Message -
From: Yuan Sun sunyu...@huawei.com
To: Jan Stancek jstan...@redhat.com
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2015 10:43:02 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] container: new testcase pidns32
Hi Jan,
See in-line comments.
On 2015/8/11
On 2015/8/11 21:58, Jan Stancek wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yuan Sun sunyu...@huawei.com
To: Jan Stancek jstan...@redhat.com
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2015 10:43:02 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] container: new testcase pidns32
Hi Jan,
