Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Onboard LAN on ECS K7S5A

2002-03-10 Thread Dirk Wirsbitzki
Hi, Randall Craig wrote: > I am not sure what the chipset is on that board. Do a lspci -vv > and you will get the chipset information. But I imagine it uses the > SiS 900 ethernet code. > > Linuxbios see: http://www.linuxbios.org has been successfully used > on its cousin ECS K7SEM. But I hav

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Chips for 3c905B-TX NM

2002-03-10 Thread jam
Suhardi, That's the chip I use. Jim. On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Suhardi Hamid wrote: > Dear sirs, > I wish to know what are the eprom/flash rom chips compatible with > 3c905B-TX NM. I have tried SST 29EE512 (90-4C-PH) and it's working fine. > However, the chip is hardly found in local stores here. I

[Ltsp-discuss] Chips for 3c905B-TX NM

2002-03-10 Thread Suhardi Hamid
Dear sirs, I wish to know what are the eprom/flash rom chips compatible with 3c905B-TX NM. I have tried SST 29EE512 (90-4C-PH) and it's working fine. However, the chip is hardly found in local stores here. I'll be glad if anyone could suggest me other chips that I can try on. Thank you. _

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Ownerless processes

2002-03-10 Thread jam
Julius, That's great news. I've kind of noticed that people haven't been complaining about this as much lately. Jim. On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Julius Szelagiewicz wrote: > Jim, > this was a problem in rh71, it went away with 72. i ue k120s 2.0 > and the gdm - no problems. julius > > On Sun

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Ownerless processes

2002-03-10 Thread Julius Szelagiewicz
Jim, this was a problem in rh71, it went away with 72. i ue k120s 2.0 and the gdm - no problems. julius On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Zak, > > If only it were that easy :) > > As I understand it, it is really a function of the display manager > to kill any running tasks

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Onboard LAN on ECS K7S5A

2002-03-10 Thread Randall Craig
I am not sure what the chipset is on that board. Do a lspci -vv and you will get the chipset information. But I imagine it uses the SiS 900 ethernet code. Linuxbios see: http://www.linuxbios.org has been successfully used on its cousin ECS K7SEM. But I have not tried using ltsp on it. Cheers,

[Ltsp-discuss] A Quick Thanks!

2002-03-10 Thread Lachlan Dunlop
Well everything is very cool at the moment. I am running ltsp 3.0, SuSE 7.0. With thin clients based on the MES-N NLX Asus box. I have rewritten my data collection code from using named pipes to sockets. This is a *very* nice solution for a manufacturing floor, or POS systems. My Microtouch t

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Shutdown

2002-03-10 Thread Johannes Berth
* Rainer_Standke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10.03.02 23:28]: > does it matter to switch the ltsp-workstation off after finished work or > must it been shut down? You should logout and terminate all your processes, but then you can just switch off the workstation. __

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Shutdown

2002-03-10 Thread Jo
On Sunday 10 March 2002 23:28, Rainer_Standke wrote: > Hi, > does it matter to switch the ltsp-workstation off after finished work or > must it been shut down? > The way I understand it, it is always better to do a logout. Jo _

[Ltsp-discuss] Shutdown

2002-03-10 Thread Rainer_Standke
Hi, does it matter to switch the ltsp-workstation off after finished work or must it been shut down? Gruss Rainer -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.swoos.de/ _ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] starting syslogd

2002-03-10 Thread Cicero Mota
Michel, Probably, you do need to configure X for the workstation, look in LTSROOT/lts.conf Cicero On Saturday 10 March 2001 16:58, you wrote: > Following my first post on this subject /var/log/messages reported the > following: > > syslogd started: busybox v0.60.1 (2001.09.28-01:12+) > devf

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Ownerless processes

2002-03-10 Thread jam
Zak, If only it were that easy :) As I understand it, it is really a function of the display manager to kill any running tasks if a user dissappears. Really outside the scope of the LTSP. Although I agree that it is important for us. It seems that GDM is the display manager that causes the mo

[Ltsp-discuss] Ownerless processes

2002-03-10 Thread Zak McGregor
Hi all OK, that's not quite an accurate description, but when users simply switch off their terminals, their processes don't seem to die along with them. Searching the ltsp-discuss archives yielded a few options for dealing with these orphaned processes, but they all seem to be slightly dodgy in

[Ltsp-discuss] starting syslogd

2002-03-10 Thread Michel Donais
Following my first post on this subject /var/log/messages reported the following: syslogd started: busybox v0.60.1 (2001.09.28-01:12+) devfsd[108]: Caught SIGHUP devfsd[108]: read config file: "/etc/devfsd.conf" init: entering runlevel: 2 init: switching to runlevel: 5 init: no more processes

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] connecting to W2k terminal server

2002-03-10 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
Sitat Conrad Lawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There is no way to use rdesktop without using KDE or GNOME. However, > I believe that you can configure KDE to autolaunch rdesktop at > startup. Check the ltsp contribution area and the ltsp mail > archives. I believe someone has already done this. Wh

[Ltsp-discuss] starting syslogd

2002-03-10 Thread Michel Donais
I succeded to start dhcp and the the workstation is coming up to: Starting syslogd and hang at this point. My set up configuration is exactly as provided by LTSP.ORG The workstation is a Shuttle FV24 computer the processor is a Celeron 900 Mhz Memory 256 meg SDRAM the following accessories are

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] connecting to W2k terminal server

2002-03-10 Thread Jo
On Sunday 10 March 2002 17:23, Conrad Lawes wrote: > There is no way to use rdesktop without using KDE or GNOME. However, I > believe that you can configure KDE to autolaunch rdesktop at startup. > Check the ltsp contribution area and the ltsp mail archives. I believe > someone has already done

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] local apps

2002-03-10 Thread David Johnston
Cicero Mota wrote: > Hi, > I did install remote apps for my ltsp workstation, but the > time to launch looks too big: simple > $ rsh xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ls > takes more than 11s > Does anybody know why is it so slow? > Can it be better Cicero, a few things for you to check: 1. Are you using ipchains

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] connecting to W2k terminal server

2002-03-10 Thread David Johnston
Conrad Lawes wrote: > Jo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I managed to connect an LTSP client to a Win2k terminal server >> using rdesktop (www.rdesktop.org). Is it possible to have the >> LTSP terminal connect to the W2k terminal server immediately? > > There is no way to use rdesktop without using

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] connecting to W2k terminal server

2002-03-10 Thread Conrad Lawes
There is no way to use rdesktop without using KDE or GNOME. However, I believe that you can configure KDE to autolaunch rdesktop at startup. Check the ltsp contribution area and the ltsp mail archives. I believe someone has already done this. Jo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (by way of Jo <[EMAIL PROT

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Onboard LAN on ECS K7S5A

2002-03-10 Thread Conrad Lawes
It is usually impossible and risky to flash a BIOS integrated boot ROM using a utility from a third party. Normally only the PC or motherboard manufacturer can supply the flash utility to update or replace your BIOS. I suspect that your BIOS-integrated boot ROM uses the PXE network boot protoc

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] dhcpd-Problem

2002-03-10 Thread Wouter DeBacker
Ernst, I've got LTSP 3.0 running on SuSE 7.3 Tip (1) : To start DHCP when the server boots you have to change a parameter through Yast (1!!) : == Start Yast == Choose == Choose == Hit F4 to search for a specific parameter == Type START_D and hit == Make sure START_DHCPD is selected == Hit F

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] dhcpd-Problem

2002-03-10 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 02:20:27PM +0100, Ernst Klein wrote: > I think dhcpd is not running. Starting it manually: > > # dhcpd & > > Internet Software Consortium DHCP Server V3.0rc12 > Copyright 1995-2001 Internet Software Consortium. > All rights reserved. > For info, please visit http://www.is

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] dhcpd-Problem

2002-03-10 Thread Bastian Dingeldein
Hello, look at the dhcpd message. it cant find the /etc/dhcpd.conf. you wrote that you edited the /etc/dhcp.conf. (ist vielleicht nur ein tip-fehler) good luck, bastian On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 14:20, Ernst Klein wrote: > Hello, > > I`m installing a new server based on SuSE7.3 and ltsp 3.0 >

[Ltsp-discuss] Onboard LAN on ECS K7S5A

2002-03-10 Thread Dave Shiels
Which is the correct Etherboot Image for the Onboard LAN on the ECS K7S5A Motherboard? Has anyone successfully flashed a boot rom onto the BIOS? -- Crayne's law: All computers wait at the same speed. _ Ltsp-discuss mailing list

[Ltsp-discuss] dhcpd-Problem

2002-03-10 Thread Ernst Klein
Hello, I`m installing a new server based on SuSE7.3 and ltsp 3.0 In the past I used SuSE 7.1 and ltsp 2.07 with bootp and it worked great. I installed successful the following tgz-packages: ltsp_core-3.0.0.tgz (with changes in the file suse-7.3.sh ,which were discussed here some weeks ago) lts

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] rw NFS and security.

2002-03-10 Thread Berend De Schouwer
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 18:35, Jason A. Pattie wrote: > Berend De Schouwer wrote: > > >>>*** A possible solution may be to create a VPN(IPSEC) betweeen the client > >>>and the server. Allow the home directory to be mounted only through the > >>>VPN. > >>> > >>A very good solution and one that is no