Interesting. I've NEVER seen a 30-pin socket.
I guess you learn something every day, eh ?
Jim.
On 8 Mar 2003, Roy Souther wrote:
> No it definitely is a 30 pin socket. I have 32 pin chips. If it was a 32
> pin socket I would have used one but it is definitely a 30 pin socket.
>
> On Sat, 200
Forget it. It is a 32 pin socket. The guy I have working for me miss counted, twice.
Roy Souther
www.SiliconTao.com
Changing the way people do business.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Wrong NIC pedro. That picture if for a RealTech NIC.
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:40, pedro noticioso wrote:
there ya go, a nice picture to enlighten the subjetc
8)
http://geocities.com/cucnews/eprom.html
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Roy,
>
> It's probably a 32-pin socket, not a 30-pin.
>
well I was reffering to the EPROM, because its the
least known part of the combination and a rough ASCII
drawing doesnt help as much as the picture 8)
--- Roy Souther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wrong NIC pedro. That picture if for a RealTech NIC.
>
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:40, pedro noticios
No it definitely is a 30 pin socket. I have 32 pin chips. If it was a 32 pin socket I would have used one but it is definitely a 30 pin socket.
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 17:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roy,
It's probably a 32-pin socket, not a 30-pin.
A 28 pin chip can sometimes be used. I'm no
install fastboot.c as a local app
--- Abraham Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I would like to ensure that all the ltsp clients are
> rebooted monthly. Has anyone tried this? We have
> 153+ clients. We are using LTSP 3.0.
>
> I am considering adding local app support to our
> clients so
try the "vesa", "fbdev" or the "vga" drivers and set
the modelines, for generic values use 60 Mhz with this
automatic calculator
http://www.hut.fi/Misc/Electronics/faq/vga2rgb/calc.html
--- Norine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am running LTSP v3 on RH8. One of my terminals is
> a Packa
there ya go, a nice picture to enlighten the subjetc
8)
http://geocities.com/cucnews/eprom.html
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Roy,
>
> It's probably a 32-pin socket, not a 30-pin.
>
> A 28 pin chip can sometimes be used. I'm not sure
> about the 3com,
> whether that will allow it, but it's wo
Roy,
It's probably a 32-pin socket, not a 30-pin.
A 28 pin chip can sometimes be used. I'm not sure about the 3com,
whether that will allow it, but it's worth a try.
Take a look at:
http://www.ltsp.org/documentation/eproms.txt
There's a crude drawing of how a 28-pin chip fits in a 32-pin
s
I wanted to program a bootrom for a 3c59x card but the darn thing has a socket for a 30 pin ROM chip. Does it need a 30 pin ROM chip or can I use a standard 28 pin?
If I can use a 28 pin chip does pin 1 go in the pin 1 location?
Roy Souther
www.SiliconTao.com
Changing the way people do bu
> Billy Charlton wrote:
> [snip]
>> Question: How can I get the hard drive to spin down (sleep) on the
>> workstations?
You can use hdparm, for example:
hdparm -Y /dev/hda
to put /dev/hda to sleep
--
Yifang Dai
Senior System Administrator
Yarde Metals Inc
71 Horizon Drive, Bristol, CT 06010
Billy,
Does your machine's BIOS have a Power Management option to spin the drives down?
Pete
--
http://www.elbnet.com
ELB Internet Service, Inc.
Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting
Billy Charlton wrote:
[snip]
> Question: How can I get the hard drive to spin down (sleep) on the
Hallo Clodoaldo,
am 08.03.2003, 23:18 schriebst Du:
> service tftp
> {
> disable = no
> socket_type = dgram
> protocol= udp
> wait= yes
> user= tftp
> server = /usr
Hello Anselm,
Thank you,
> > What should I do abou the user nobody? This is my
> > \etc\xinetd.d\tftp:
>
> didn't transfer up to me. Check that a user "nobody"
> exists in
> /etc/passwd and that his group exists too.
Sorry, this is my /etc/xinetd.d/tftp:
service tftp
{
disable = no
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 23:24, Clodoaldo Pinto Neto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TFTPD is working since I can connect to it using the
> tftp client and get the files in /tftpboot/lts.
> Mar 8 17:09:35 k7s5a in.tftpd[23761]: cannot set
> groups for user nobody
>
> What should I do abou the user nobody? This is
Hallo Clodoaldo,
am 08.03.2003, 22:24 schriebst Du:
> Hi,
> TFTPD is working since I can connect to it using the
> tftp client and get the files in /tftpboot/lts.
> What should I do abou the user nobody? This is my
> \etc\xinetd.d\tftp:
didn't transfer up to me. Check that a user "nobody" exis
Hi,
TFTPD is working since I can connect to it using the
tftp client and get the files in /tftpboot/lts.
The problem is this:
Mar 8 17:09:35 k7s5a dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from
00:07:95:fd:44:24 via eth0
Mar 8 17:09:35 k7s5a dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.0.3
to 00:07:95:fd:44:24 via eth0
Mar 8 17:09:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am the Secretary General of ALL NIGERIA FARMERS
CONGRESS, and I'm writing to intimate you of a
business proposal, if you will be willing to do
business with me urgently. On January 15th 1997, the
DEMOCRATICE REPUBLIC OF KOREA signed a joint venture
contract Ref #M-K TC970115 wit
Hi All,
I am running LTSP v3 on RH8. One of my terminals is a Packard Bell P133
with the built in Cirrus chip set. It is using a 3Com 3C590 NIC. It
boots fine but when I get to the X session it appears as 2 images on the
monitor, one overlapped over the other but one image is to the left of
the oth
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 00:16, pedro noticioso wrote:
>
> yeah, what about filesystem tunning, every since I use
> ext3 I have practically forgotten all about it, is
> there doc to make it work faster?
Well ext3 isn't quite the absolute filesystem, using ext3 for system
files, reiserfs for small fi
Faisal,
Check the broadcast setting in the dhcpd.conf file. I've seen
an incorrect broadcast address cause this problem.
If you are unsure what to set it to, then send us
the dhcpd.conf file.
Thanks,
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, faisal ahmed wrote:
>
> hello...
>
>
Hallo Jake,
am 08.03.2003, 16:58 schriebst Du:
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Mar 8 15:35 vmlinuz-2.4.19-ltsp-1
> ^ zero bytes long
> That file is empty! Most likely it was created when tftpd tried to open
> it; that's why it was created on Mar. 8, 3:35pm. Change your ke
Hallo Gerhard,
am 08.03.2003, 16:32 schriebst Du:
>> Loading 10.1.1.102: /lts/vmlinuz-2.4.19-ltsp-1 than nothing
>> happens. Which means DHCP works fine but the client can't load the
>> kernel. This is how the kernel looks like in /tftpboot/lts/
[...]
>> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Rudolf Rittmann wrote:
> Hi Everybody
>
> I've installed LTSP 3.0 on Suse 8.0 , when booring the workstation i'm
> getting something like this:
>
> Loading 10.1.1.102: /lts/vmlinuz-2.4.19-ltsp-1 than nothing
[...]
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Mar 8 1
Hello Rudolf,
- Original Message -
From: "Rudolf Rittmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ltsp-discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 3:51 PM
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Boot problem !!
> Hi Everybody
>
> I've installed LTSP 3.0 on Suse 8.0 , when booring the workstation i'm
>
hello...
i'm an engineering student doing my project in final semester..i was interested in thin clients..i downloaded LTSP-3.0 VERSION for RedHat 8.0 and i did all the things as prescribed in the LTSP documents.But,while running the client,after mounting the /opt/ltsp/i386 as root and after doing
Hi Everybody
I've installed LTSP 3.0 on Suse 8.0 , when booring the workstation i'm
getting something like this:
Loading 10.1.1.102: /lts/vmlinuz-2.4.19-ltsp-1 than nothing
happens. Which means DHCP works fine but the client can't load the
kernel. This is how the kernel looks like in /tft
27 matches
Mail list logo
