Mandar,
Can you get the PCI Vendor and Device ID numbers from that card ?
Then, we can see if that card is supported by the Linux eepro100
driver.
I'm guessing that it is a fairly new card, and not in the niclist.
To get around this, try adding option-128 and option-129,
and set NIC=eepro100 in
Hi guys,
I am facing a problem with eepro100 driver. I have a IBM machine with on
board intel lan card. The etherboot floppy which i made for eepro100
driver detects the lan card. It then contacts the DHCP server and
downloads the kernel and then starts initialising itself. But here I get
a er
Hello,
I am interested in setting up of diskless
workstations. I have P1 m/c. with 16MB RAM. I want to
setup Linux environment as follows:
-1 Linux server P4 m/c. with 256MB RAM, 40GB HDD, PCI
NIC 10/100mbps
-5 Linux diskless workstations all are P1 with 16MB
RAM, 2MB of SVGA Cards, 10mbps
Title: Untitled Document
이 페이지는 광고 페이지 입니다.
귀하의 메일주소는 웹서핑 중 알게된 것이며,E-Mail 주소 외에 다른 정보는 갖고 있지 않습니다.
정통부 권고사항에 의거 제목에 [광고]라고 표기한 메일이며,수신거부 장치를 마련하고
있습니다.
수신을 원치 않으시면 수신거부(Reject
Mail) 를 클릭해 주십시요.
-
Swap file size? at least usse "32" for 32 megabytes of
NFS swap memory 8)
for the rest of the opntions read this:
http://ltsp.org/documentation/ltsp-3.0-4-en.html
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> My WS are 486/586/P100 and all of them have 16 mb.
> ram and I´d like to know the
Hello,
Just got my firs USB device (a mouse) and wanted to try it on my VIA 533
thin-klient.
I've looked at the USB-mouse howto, but found it was a bit old, since I could
find all the kernel modules mentioned under ltsproot/lib. I tried only
including them as
MODULE_01 = usbcore
Hallo Clodoaldo,
am 09.03.2003, 22:39 schriebst Du:
> Hi Anselm,
> Detail: It only works when the user is set to root in /etc/xinetd.d/tftp
Explained by G. Baum probably.
> Here are the good news: I changed the permissions on the kernel file to
> owner-execute and now it works !!! I can ping a
Hooray and Boo. If you want to use Rays w/LTSP, you need high-priced Sun hardware and software too, unless you want to do some soldering, which might make it possible.
I heard from John and did more research. It appears they will not boot from anything other than an Ultra w/SRSS and have only 8
> If this is tftpd-hpa, then change the user to root. This version of tftpd
> will change the effective user id / group id to nobody/nogroup internally
> (unless you specify something else with the -u commandline option).
> If tftpd is started as nobody, then it has no rights to change its group
Hi Anselm,
> You wrote that you could tftp-get the kernel from the server. You used
> "tftp localhost", not "tftp 192.168.0.2", did you? What happens on the
> .0.2 address (or whatever the local ip of the linux server is) when
> downloading back on the linux-server itself?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cpn]#
Am Sonntag, 9. März 2003 19:30 schrieb Clodoaldo Pinto Neto:
> After the group change I have the same message about user nobody:
> Mar 9 15:18:21 k7s5a in.tftpd[18887]: cannot set groups for user nobody
If this is tftpd-hpa, then change the user to root. This version of tftpd
will change the eff
Hallo Clodoaldo,
am 09.03.2003, 19:30 schriebst Du:
> After the group change I have the same message about user nobody:
> Mar 9 15:18:21 k7s5a in.tftpd[18887]: cannot set groups for user nobody
OK, I do not like it. It most probably is the cause for why tftp does
not (fully?) work.
You wrote th
Martin, did that work? I will try that on Monday.
I know some NIC do that but I did not know it was the first rows of pins to leave empty.
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 19:34, Martin Herweg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Take a look at:
>
> http://www.ltsp.org/documentation/eproms.txt
>
> Th
Anseml,
If it weren't your help I would have already gave up. At least for this
weekend. Thanks again.
> Try additionally specifying something like "group=nogroup" (of course
> that group must exist) in combination with "user=nobody".
I did it:
{
disable = no
socket_type
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Jeff Jackowski wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Bryan Cruickshank wrote:
>
> :-)
>
> >I really don't have a good grasp of what the difference is between using
> >ltsp to boot the iopener vs using ltsp and etherboot to boot a normal
> > < snip>
>
> The only difference with the
Dear friends,
My WS are 486/586/P100 and all of them
have 16 mb. ram and I´d like to know the right
value for " swapfile_size " and the other options
in LTS.CONF.
Thanks.
Rogerio Valle
---Outgoing mail is certified Virus
Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Take a look at:
>
> http://www.ltsp.org/documentation/eproms.txt
>
> There's a crude drawing of how a 28-pin chip fits in a 32-pin
> socket.
you can also have a look at my closeup picture of an 3c595 Card
with 28-pin etherboot-EPROM inside:
http://www.lug-marl.de/do
Hallo Clodoaldo,
am 09.03.2003, 13:46 schriebst Du:
> It happens the same message about the user nobody.
Try additionally specifying something like "group=nogroup" (of course
that group must exist) in combination with "user=nobody". You can find
out if they exist with
grep nogroup /etc/group
gr
Anselm,
Your support is appreciated.
> You could make "user=nobody" instead of "user=tftp". What happens then?
It happens the same message about the user nobody.
> Please post your dhcpd.conf.
ddns-update-style none;
allow booting;
allow bootp;
default-lease-time21600;
Hallo Clodoaldo,
am 09.03.2003, 10:45 schriebst Du:
> Yes they are in a single hub. The adresses are
> 198.162.0.1-2-3 and the mask is 255.255.255.0
Fine.
>> Can you tftp-get the file from the win machine?
> No, I can't tftp-get the file from the win machine.
> The server gives me the same mes
Dragos,
Thank you for your response.
> Yeah, LTS is plain stupid, it won't work (even if I
>spend weeks configuring it).
> You may try to spend a few days reading some
>documentation and then it will be easy to configure
>your server.
> Try not to be upset on Linux systems, they are
smart, >ofte
Anselm,
Thank you again for your reply
> The diskless client and the linux machine are
> connected to the same
> ethernet segment, aren't they (that means, only
> hubs/switches, no
> routers/other computers in between)?
Yes they are in a single hub. The adresses are
198.162.0.1-2-3 and the mask
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Bryan Cruickshank wrote:
:-)
>I really don't have a good grasp of what the difference is between using
>ltsp to boot the iopener vs using ltsp and etherboot to boot a normal
>dc. I know that we are basically loading a kernal that will support the
>usb nic so that the networ
23 matches
Mail list logo
