[Ltsp-discuss] Client with 2 graphics cards

2004-05-27 Thread Eilert
Hi, I've got one PC with built-in graphics here I'd like to take as an LTSP terminal. It's got a built-in graphics chip (simple Cirrus chip) and would need more graphics RAM. The built-in graphics card cannot be deactivated. So I stuffed in a Matrox card, and this takes over the graphics at onc

[Ltsp-discuss] FYI: Persistent X sessions!

2004-05-27 Thread Adam J. Bradley
http://vncsessmgr.sourceforge.net Anyone had any luck getting this project to work under LTSP (or for that matter, on any machine?) Thanks in advance! Adam --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ev

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] MPEG video on a thin client...

2004-05-27 Thread Nick
Bill Hess wrote: Howdy - I am pretty new to LTSP, but I am looking to see if anyone out there has played MPEG video from a thin client? Was this done using just software or a special MPEG card in the thin client? Thanks... Yes. Playing Mpeg on a thin client generates a lot of network traffic

[Ltsp-discuss] MPEG video on a thin client...

2004-05-27 Thread Bill Hess
Howdy - I am pretty new to LTSP, but I am looking to see if anyone out there has played MPEG video from a thin client? Was this done using just software or a special MPEG card in the thin client? Thanks... -- Bill Hess Technology Resource Group

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: LTSP and kerberos - the perfect match?

2004-05-27 Thread jam
Andrew, Excellent stuff. See my reply earlier to Targei regarding getting together on IRC to discuss all this. I'm VERY interested in seeing it all work. Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 27 May 2004, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 18:58, Tarjei Huse wrote: > > Hi,

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP and kerberos - the perfect match?

2004-05-27 Thread jam
Tarjei, Great stuff. I've been seriously looking at Kerberos as a way to authenticate an LTSP session. I'm still reading the O'Reilly kerberos book, trying to get a clear picture in my head for how it all works. It probably a good idea for us to get together on IRC and discuss some of the de

[Ltsp-discuss] Local Firefox Printing

2004-05-27 Thread Paul Coray
Hi all I am about to roll out following LTSP Setup for kiosk-style OPAC-Terminals with Firefox running as single local application. - Server: Fedora Core 1, Dual P III 550, 1 GB RAM, 2.4.22-1.2188.nptlsmp, with LTSP 4. 2 NIC, one for the Thin Clients and one to the internet. - 16 Clients (Cele

[Ltsp-discuss] Re: LTSP and kerberos - the perfect match?

2004-05-27 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 18:58, Tarjei Huse wrote: > Hi, this is from a discussion I had with Samba developer Andrew > Bartlett. We were discussing usage of the Heimdal kerberos module > hdb-ldap when it turned out that both of us have the same idea on what > to use for - LTSP. > What do you guys thi

[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP Audio

2004-05-27 Thread seekuel von seek
hi guys, Could you help me by giving us the steps on making our diskless work station give an audio output. we are now using Linux Mandrake 9.2 and LTSP 3. Our work station is a thin client with an ear phone. Thanks Guys Need a new email address that people can remember Check out the new Eudo

[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP and kerberos - the perfect match?

2004-05-27 Thread Tarjei Huse
Hi, this is from a discussion I had with Samba developer Andrew Bartlett. We were discussing usage of the Heimdal kerberos module hdb-ldap when it turned out that both of us have the same idea on what to use for - LTSP. What do you guys think of the ideas presented here? Has anyone used LTSP and k

[Ltsp-discuss] RFI UK Companies

2004-05-27 Thread Richard Rothwell
Hi, At Schoolforge we are constructing a list of all the companies in the UK who are trying to sell GNU/Linux solutions into schools. We are hoping to develop a consortium of these small companies to share costs or marketing and provide continuity of supply to schools. Details at: http://tinyurl

Virus Alert - ScanMail for Lotus Notes --> [Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2004-05-27 Thread Viruslog
ScanMail has detected a virus during a real-time scan of the mail traffic. Date: 27/05/2004 10:21:20 Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Virus: WORM_NETSKY.D File: yours.pif From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: Deleted; Scanned

[Ltsp-discuss] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2004-05-27 Thread Administrator
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s). Sender = Mail Delivery System Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = [Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Scanning time = 05/27/2004 10:26:17 Engine/Pattern = 7.000-1004/895 Action on virus

[Ltsp-discuss] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient virus found and action taken.

2004-05-27 Thread Administrator
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s). Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject = [Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Scanning time = 5/27/2004 3:56:12 AM Engine/Pattern = 6.810-1005/1.895.00 Action on vir

[Ltsp-discuss] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2004-05-27 Thread Mail Delivery System
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message has been rejected because it has a potentially e