Re: [Ltsp-discuss] UK Keyboard layout to all clients

2006-08-21 Thread Ben Green
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:29:44 +0100, Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > IMHO read up /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/lts.conf.readme and then edit the > default section of /opt/ltsp/i386/etc/lts.conf > I have the following in my [default] section: XkbModel= pc105 Xk

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] UK Keyboard layout to all clients

2006-08-21 Thread Sudev Barar
On 22/08/06, Matthew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using K12LTSP and think it is great, really fast and stable, only > trouble is I can't find anywhere to configure keyboard layout for the > clients. > > LTSP Docs say xorg.conf but that file doesn't seem to exist.. can anyone > tell me wh

[Ltsp-discuss] UK Keyboard layout to all clients

2006-08-21 Thread Matthew Allen
I am using K12LTSP and think it is great, really fast and stable, only trouble is I can't find anywhere to configure keyboard layout for the clients. LTSP Docs say xorg.conf but that file doesn't seem to exist.. can anyone tell me what file do I edit and how to get K12LTSP clients into UK (Great B

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Kernel panic => problem identified ... but not solved....

2006-08-21 Thread Nicolas CHEVE
Le Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:28:29 +0200 CHEVE Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: >Quoting Andy Trevor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Dave Cotton wrote: >>> If it's a recent version of dhcp you'll need a >>> >>> next-server 192.168.10.254; >>> >>> statement. >>> >> I have just had the same issue with this

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Duplicated number of connected users

2006-08-21 Thread Otaci Martins
My system specs: Server: - Fedora Core 4 - Kernel 2.6.14-1.1653 - KDE 3.5 - LTSP 4.2 update 2 - CPU Xeon 3.2 GHz - 04 GB RAM - Ethernet 100/1000 Mbps - HD SCSI Stations: - Boot PXE - LTSP Kernel 2.6.17 - CPU 533 MHz - 128 MB RAM - Ethernet 100 Mbps X is starting via startx script, only based i

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Duplicated number of connected users

2006-08-21 Thread Joe Auerbach
What distro are you running? Do you start X as an automatic process, or do you use the startx script? Otaci Martins wrote: >The stations doesn't open a shell on the LTSP Server. > >See my lts.conf: > >[Default] >SERVER = tc02 >DNS_SERVER = 10.200.20

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] local devices on openbox

2006-08-21 Thread Jim McQuillan
J, Using a window manager that doesn't display icons is fine. The users can still get to the local devices by looking at the 'Drives' folder in the users home directory. Each local device should have a sub-folder in that Drives folder. Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] toman wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Duplicated number of connected users

2006-08-21 Thread Otaci Martins
The stations doesn't open a shell on the LTSP Server. See my lts.conf: [Default] SERVER = tc02 DNS_SERVER = 10.200.201.15 SEARCH_DOMAIN = esplanada XSERVER = vesa SCREEN_01 = startx

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] MueKow

2006-08-21 Thread Ryan Roth
Any suggestions for the following: > I think I'm getting close. I set my pxelinux.cfg/default to boot the > > vmlinuz and initrd I copied from /opt/muekow/i386/boot > > my pxelinux.cfg: > > default linux > prompt 1 > timeout 1 > label linux >kernel vmlinuz >append initrd=initrd.img init=dis

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Duplicated number of connected users

2006-08-21 Thread Joe Auerbach
If you've got the server set up to log them into a shell on one screen and a desktop on another (which is pretty much the default) then that's entirely likely. Unless they logged into those shells, however, I would guess that you have them set to auto-login. Does that sound correct? They c

[Ltsp-discuss] Duplicated number of connected users

2006-08-21 Thread Otaci Martins
'Top' command always shows double users than i really have in my LTSP server. For instance, when 25 five users are logged in, 'top' shows 50. When i use 'w' command i get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# w 15:02:29 up 4 days, 21:20, 49 users, load average: 14,26, 10,22, 9,82 USERTTY FROM

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Kernel panic

2006-08-21 Thread CHEVE Nicolas
Quoting Andy Trevor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dave Cotton wrote: >> If it's a recent version of dhcp you'll need a >> >> next-server 192.168.10.254; >> >> statement. >> > I have just had the same issue with this and HP5125 thins. I changed > the kernel on load to one of the 2.6.16 ones and it all wo

[Ltsp-discuss] Debian (ubuntu) packages

2006-08-21 Thread Andy Rabagliati
Folks, I have repackaged ltsp4.2 as debs. If you add the following to /etc/apt/sources.list, deb ftp://ftp.wizzy.com/pub/wizzy/debs dapper binary And do "apt-get update ; apt-get install ltsp" you should get a bunch of packages from the server. I did some small tweaks to ltsp-ltsptr

[Ltsp-discuss] local devices on openbox

2006-08-21 Thread toman
Hi, I'm running LTSP 4.2 and allow our library patrons to use openbox on our public terminals. Is there a good way to allow access to local devices, actually USB thumbdrive access is all I need, for a window manager that doesn't stick icons on the desktop?

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Kernel panic

2006-08-21 Thread Andy Trevor
Dave Cotton wrote: > If it's a recent version of dhcp you'll need a > > next-server 192.168.10.254; > > statement. > I have just had the same issue with this and HP5125 thins. I changed the kernel on load to one of the 2.6.16 ones and it all worked fine. I have not had time to dig around to f

[Ltsp-discuss] Suse 10.1 nbd swap problems

2006-08-21 Thread Giorgio emanuel
> I've found some problems about the ltspswapd daemon at suse 10.1, the >daemon appears to be started but it does not work, i'm usin the command >line: chkconfig | grep ltspswapd and it show that the daemon is on, but >when >i restart the service manually i do not receive confirmation about the >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Raid 1 or Raid 5? New server advice.

2006-08-21 Thread Ben Green
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:47:05 +0100, Gudmund Areskoug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Krsnendu Dasa wrote: >> Why are Opteron's recommended? On Anandtech, Tom's Hardware etc they all >> say >> that the new Xeon Dual Core beats the Opteron hands down. > > beats it under what circumstances? AFAIR, Opter

[Ltsp-discuss] Local apps + KDE

2006-08-21 Thread hein du plessis
Hallo I am new to the mailing list although I have used LTSP before. I installed ltsp 4.2 from the ISO (all packages). I then enabled Local apps in lts.conf. I installed some kde rpm and qt rpm. When I start X I get the messages that libqt-mt.so.3 is not found. I made an entry in ld.so.conf and r

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Raid 1 or Raid 5? New server advice.

2006-08-21 Thread Gudmund Areskoug
Krsnendu Dasa wrote: > Why are Opteron's recommended? On Anandtech, Tom's Hardware etc they all > say > that the new Xeon Dual Core beats the Opteron hands down. beats it under what circumstances? AFAIR, Opterons suitability for LTSP lies largely in how it handles multitasking/multithreading, so i