Hi folks,
As I'm building a new server, there is the question of the quantity of
swap space given to the terminals.
The terminals all have 512 MB RAM. Up to now, we have 512 MB swap. Would
it make sense to give them 1024 MB instead, or would that have
side-effects like longer response times
Cannot confirm this. 512 MB RAM can be too small if users are surfin'
Firefox and sites with a huge amount of graphics content. So if I switch
off ltspswap, there are crashes (not frequently but there are some). If
I switch it on, the system runs flawlessly.
Rolf
Krsnendu dasa schrieb:
512
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 05.03.2008, 13:44 -0500 schrieb Rob Owens:
I'd like to run 2 instances of ssh on my LTSP 5 server, so that I may
disallow password authentication from the internet. I know I can
compile from source for the 2nd instance, but is there any way of using
Ubuntu's
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.03.2008, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Reinald Gfuellner:
SCREEN_07 = startx
ltspfs needs the ssh tunnel in place, XDMCP is not used in ltsp5 (we
still have the option for using startx, but none of the features are
developed for it) if you want unecrypted X
Trying to set up local ltsp5-device-support according
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebugLocalDev I keep failing at
Step 4: Can you manually issue a mount command?
server_$ ltspfs thin_client:/tmp /tmp/mnt add
ERROR connecting
Aparentely ltspfsd did not come up:
server_$ nmap -A thin_client
On Friday 07 March 2008 05:12:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As I'm building a new server, there is the question of the quantity of
swap space given to the terminals.
The terminals all have 512 MB RAM. Up to now, we have 512 MB swap. Would
it make sense to give them 1024 MB instead, or would
On Friday 07 March 2008 05:12:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SCREEN_07 = startx
ltspfs needs the ssh tunnel in place, XDMCP is not used in ltsp5 (we
still have the option for using startx, but none of the features are
developed for it) if you want unecrypted X transport use
jam schrieb:
On Friday 07 March 2008 05:12:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As I'm building a new server, there is the question of the quantity of
swap space given to the terminals.
The terminals all have 512 MB RAM. Up to now, we have 512 MB swap. Would
it make sense to give them 1024 MB
