It's interesting that you're wanting a lite version of LTSP. I know the specs
say that more modern equipment is needed for LTSP 5, but I have a PII with 64
MB Ram that runs perfectly fine on LTSP 5. We have a couple of PI's that I've
been thinking of testing with it; but I just don't need the
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 01:44 -0300, José Queiroz wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure what a solution is. Part of it may be solved by distros
> > offering,
> > or users posting instructions how to make, scaled down "light" versions of
> > the
> > kernel, and udev rules, which will eliminate some of the bl
>
> I'm not sure what a solution is. Part of it may be solved by distros
> offering,
> or users posting instructions how to make, scaled down "light" versions of the
> kernel, and udev rules, which will eliminate some of the bloat.
>
Hi,
That's a really interesting coincidence: I'm working on a
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 03:53:19PM -0600, Scott Balneaves wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:52:39PM -0800, john wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One of the reasons I originally found LTSP compelling was the modest
> > specs required of the thin clients. Lately I've been feeling like my
> > flavor of L
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:52:39PM -0800, john wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One of the reasons I originally found LTSP compelling was the modest
> specs required of the thin clients. Lately I've been feeling like my
> flavor of Linux/LTSP (ubuntu) has entered the same kind of systems
> requirement arms-ra
Jim,
I'm interested in what you're saying - would you think that, with all of
the functionality LTSP5 has given us (sound/localdev/etc), it would be
safe to say that a simple update in system requirements is all that
we'll need (until the next flash of feature requests are implemented,
which h
John,
It's a very interesting comment that you are making about LTSP and the
hardware that is required to use it.
In the beginning, LTSP was designed and intended for small machines. 10
years ago, there was tons of 133 and 166Mhz Pentiums with a whopping
32mb of ram. I made sure that it ran o
Hi all,
One of the reasons I originally found LTSP compelling was the modest
specs required of the thin clients. Lately I've been feeling like my
flavor of Linux/LTSP (ubuntu) has entered the same kind of systems
requirement arms-race that I thought I left behind when we moved away
from workstatio
Has anyone tried running DRBL and LTSP on the same server? I'm aware
that the install scripts would most likely mess up a working LTSP
server. But I would be interested in manually installing it so that I
could adjust dhcpd.conf and /etc/exports. Probably not the right
list for this question bu
Thanks Rob. I'm using Samba/LDAP so I don't think that's the same
problem per se. However I did just find a possible workaround from
Peter Childs. Thanks Peter, I'm giving it a test now.
http://www.mail-archive.com/ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net/msg34448.html
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 8:1
no falo
2009/2/25 Antonio Prado :
> Trabalho sem problemas com o ltsp na versão 4.1 e 4.2, no entanto, não
> estou obtendo sucesso com sua instalação na versão 5 no ubuntu 8.10.
>
>
> Já realizei diversas tentativas, sempre me esbarrando em algum problema,
> cujas soluções encontradas na net não s
Trabalho sem problemas com o ltsp na versão 4.1 e 4.2, no entanto, não
estou obtendo sucesso com sua instalação na versão 5 no ubuntu 8.10.
Já realizei diversas tentativas, sempre me esbarrando em algum problema,
cujas soluções encontradas na net não se mostraram eficazes ou não fui
competente o
I think he means it took him 30 minutes to get to the point where his first
terminals could boot... Which is a compliment to the install process.
Jeremy D. Young
Systems Analyst
O'Reilly Auto Parts
(417) 862-2674 x1858
13 matches
Mail list logo
