Στις 15/02/2012 02:24 πμ, ο/η john έγραψε:
> I assume the main difference between sftp-server and the
> NFS_HOME=/home is that the NFS connection won't be encrypted?
I think NFS4 does support encryption, if you want it.
NFS_HOME_OPTIONS allow you to specify mounting options.
Personally I'm using N
Hi Alkis,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Alkis Georgopoulos wrote:
> Logging in in LTSP fat clients using sshfs (sftp-server) takes about
> twice longer than if NFS_HOME=/home is set in lts.conf.
>
> Maybe you'd want to consider switching to NFS for the user homes.
>
I don't see NFS_HOME desc
Logging in in LTSP fat clients using sshfs (sftp-server) takes about
twice longer than if NFS_HOME=/home is set in lts.conf.
Maybe you'd want to consider switching to NFS for the user homes.
--
Keep Your Developer Skills
Hi,
I am trying to install ltsp-standalone-server ( 5.2.16) on a debian wheezy
I have configured dhcp, tftpd-hpa, nfs and after booting my first client
I get a few error like
note: ltsp: missing files or directories for bind mounting
...
/etc/init.d/udev: 131: /etc/init.d/udev: ps: not found
ude
Hi all,
I am running LTSP on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, with local apps enabled. I
notice that when I have 30 + users logging on via the TC gui at once,
running 'top' shows a load average above 25 for several minutes.
Running the program iotop shows me that the each user is running a
sftp-server process wh
