Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Ubuntu 16.04 with local_apps=false doesn't start X session

2016-08-21 Thread Άλκης Γεωργόπουλος
See the lts.conf manpage. Set LTSP_FATCLIENT=False in lts.conf. Στις 21 Αυγ 2016 13:48, ο χρήστης "Dukai Gábor" έγραψε: > Hi All! > > I'm trying to replace an Ubuntu 12.04 thin client setup with Ubuntu > 16.04 ltsp-pnp fat clients turned off. > > First I tried running

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Encrypted NBD root

2015-06-02 Thread Άλκης Γεωργόπουλος
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 at 15:39 Ivan Mincik ivan.min...@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking that if we would use encrypted root, only system administrator would be able to boot client machines by manually entering password. Or, do you know any better solution ? If you're willing to go to each client

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] winxp in virtual vdi inside Ubuntu ltsp server

2015-06-02 Thread Άλκης Γεωργόπουλος
Hi Richard, KVM is just a bit better than VBox when the CPU supports hardware acceleration (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86_virtualization), but it's *extremely* slower when it doesn't, and since CPUs that don't support hardware acceleration are usually already a bit slower than the rest, it's

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTS.conf RM System Services not effective for one process

2013-09-19 Thread Άλκης Γεωργόπουλος
Στις 20/09/2013 12:50 πμ, ο/η John Hupp έγραψε: ln -s /usr/local/mesh/mesh_linux /etc/rc2.d/S20mesh So it seems that RM_System_Services and RM_Thin_System_Services don't see S20mesh as a system service, or they do see it as a system service but are not able to prevent it from running. For

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] fat client printer managament, CPU governor, NBD performance, wiki

2011-07-06 Thread Άλκης Γεωργόπουλος
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:44 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote: 2. The CPU frequency scaling governor is set to Performance by default. The /etc/init.d/ondemand file exists in the chroot, but the governor does not change, even after the 60-second sleep period and I'm not sure why.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Beware Ethernet Flow Control

2009-03-03 Thread Άλκης Γεωργόπουλος
Just reporting that I did a benchmark with flow control = off. Before: speed ~= 90 Mbps After: speed ~= 900 Mbps So upgrading the clients to gigabit isn't really required! A switch with a single (or two, if bonding is used) gigabit ports is enough! :) Thanks Jason, you saved a lot of people a