On 6/9/06, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So one idea is to modify the 'init' script of the LTSP system, the one
> that runs on the thin client, and give that a limit. Everything that the
> client runs is a descendant of init, so that should work.
Actually, that's probably wrong. U
On 6/9/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've also heard of a utility called "Process Resource Montior",
> which is a bit more sophisticated then ulimit, and may be more than
> what you want.
Er, that should be &quo
On 6/9/06, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would love it if I could have quotas for not just RAM but also CPU and
> swap. Is this at all possible?
You can use the "ulimit" command to put restrictions on individual
processes. You can use it (e.g., in a system-wide logon script) to
On 5/24/06, Duncan Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I keep getting the same message on my clients: Loading
10.0.1.47:/lts/vmlinuz-2.6.16.1-ltsp-2 .TFTP error 1 (No such file or
directory). Of course this must be a generic message, as both the file
and the directory are there.
Heh. Famous l
On 5/24/06, Patrick Noffke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Microsoft's licencing basically says that if you *display*
windows/office on a screen, by any means, you pay for the licence(s).
So, whether you use MS terminal server, rdesktop or anything else, you
still pay the cash.
How does VNC get away
On 5/24/06, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Might it help to disable oplocks on Samba server side?
That was going to be my suggestion. I know that QuickBooks and
oplocks do not get along well *at all*. The solution we used was to
create a special Samba share for file-share dat
On 5/9/06, COLOMBO Etienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have recently installed LTSP 4.2 on a Ubuntu Breezy (5.10) with no errors.
But whn i try to boot from a client with PXE i have this error message
"PXE-E32 : TFTP OPEN TIMEOUT"
That means your TFTP server (usually your LTSP server) didn't
On 5/8/06, Stephan Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
not to forget that you can not compare ide drives with 7200 rpm with
SCSI drives with up to 15000 rpm (with much better access times).
Plus, SCSI drives almost always support tagged command queueing,
which PATA never does, and SATA only rar
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 02:56:34AM +0530, Ashish Nabira wrote:
Right now all environment is running fine on Redhat 9. I just want it to
run only from win2003. I don't want to use Linux server at all. That is
requirement of my project.
What about SFU (Services For Unix)? It's a free add-on to
On 5/3/06, Stéphane Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, it even happened when I use my laptop ...
Which rules out LTSP.
Now, I wonder if the problem is LTSP, or drupal itself...
I would suspect Drupal, or possibly a problem with how the ISP has
Drupal configured. But there is one
On 5/3/06, Stéphane Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When several users are using the web site at the same time (each on
their own terminal and on their own account), they often fall on one
another's account on drupal while browsing. It is as if the web site is
having problems properly identifyin
Hi all...
I'm fairly new to this LTSP thing, so maybe I'm missing something.
If so, feel free to hit me over the head with a FAQ.
My host server is an i386 box running CentOS 4.3. Host kernel is
2.6.9-34.ELsmp; host glibc is 2.3.4-2.19. I've got the LTSP 4.2 base
system working great. Alm
On 4/10/06, Chris Northstrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed ltsp 4.2 and originally had the problem with Fedora Core 5
> and ltspcfg. I believe Sami found a work around...
What version of ltsp-utils did you install? If you've got 0.20 or
0.21, try updating to 0.22. If you tried
On 4/7/06, Jim McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, April 7, 2006 3:05 am, maris wrote:
>> I put this problem in Fedora forum.
>> http://forum.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=103184
>
> Ugh! This is NOT a fedora problem. THis is a problem with ltspcfg. I
> can fix it, but not till I g
14 matches
Mail list logo
