[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP5 on Gentoo running for me

2008-07-28 Thread Donnie Berkholz
amfs root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=192.168.0.1:/opt/ltsp/x86/ 5 -- it boots, but fails on initramfs needs networking support in the initramfs pcnet32 in this case (virtualbox/vmware). In chroot: edit /usr/share/genkernel/x86/modules_load and add pcnet32 genkernel initrd -

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Gentoo LTSP-5 problems

2007-01-16 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Anton S. Ustyuzhanin wrote: > Donnie, i found one more bug: > you offer to run ltsp emva , but try execute for example: > ltsp env | grep "ROOT=", and > ltsp sudo env | grep "ROOT=" > You will not see "ROOT=/opt/ltsp/i386/" in second command. May be > something wrong in my sudoers, but i thin that

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Gentoo LTSP-5 problems

2007-01-15 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Anton S. Ustyuzhanin wrote: > # ltsp emerge -p glibc > --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree? > --- 'profiles/updates' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree? > --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree? > > These are the package

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Gentoo removing LTSP

2007-01-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Warwick Bruce Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Donnie, please give me an idea of what your plans are for the >> MueKow/Gentoo effort so we may assist. > > Donnie, do you want to handle ltsp? I have no interest in maintaining (even by proxy) the current generation, s

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Gentoo removing LTSP

2007-01-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote: > Thusa (our company) will take over this ebuild under my direction. > Please let us know where to get onboard and what committments/updates > are required to halt the removal from the tree. Christian's already found one person to help proxy-maintain it, so it's no lo