e result.
After ltsp-chroot ssh-keygen with no passphare i loosed all admin right
on the machine.
I'm no good at ssh-kerying so i can't tell if this is a bug or if did i
do something wrong, and that is suppose to happen if done the way i did.
I'm using a *buntu deri
El mar, 07-01-2014 a las 23:42 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian escribió:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:29:32AM -0600, Luis A. Guzmán García wrote:
> > I was all day (it's late night right now) trying to set up autologin for
> > my ltsp server/thin clients. I'm using LTSP standalo
27;ll try that tomorrow since it's been a looong day trying to set this
up.
My success today was replacing iTALC by Epoptes, really handy ;)
I'll appreciate any comments on this, even if it's pointing to a good
and simple dhcpd manual ;).
Cheers.
--
Luis A. Guzmán García
¡
So, bottom line.
On a healthy LTSP network the data flow should be controlled/limited so
it can perform better, taking advantage of the TPC/IP avoiding the
buffer jamming on the switch, server or clients.
Right?
--
Luis A. Guzmán García
¡Se Libre! -- http://fsfla.org/selibre
The Hardware Databas
Alkis Georgopoulos wrote:
>Στις 04/01/2014 01:36 πμ, ο/η rkwesk_ltsp έγραψε:
>> Or are you saying that when the disabling of hardware flow control is
>
>> not an option then one should limit the rate of the data?
>
>
>Yup.
So,
Bottom line.
On a healty LTSP network is always preffered to limit
