Giacomo, On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Giacomo Trovato <giacomo.trov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm implementing an Ubuntu LTSP system with 10 thin client. Perhaps I > need Samba for some Windows clients in the network. Is it better to > use NFS or Samba with LTSP? It all depends on what you need. For Windows, you better go with Samba, because it has better integration and security. You can still use NFS for other purposes, like providing a root filesystem to your thin clients. You could also consider using NBD for that, that seems to be better than NFS, also easier to implement. Neither NFS or NBD excludes the possibility of using Samba. -- MARLON DUTRA Propus GnuPG ID: 0x3E2060AC pgp.mit.edu http://www.propus.com.br/ http://hackers.propus.com.br/~marlon/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
