Hi,
now I've checked the sites you indicated, with OpenSUSE 10.0, Firefox
1.06, with and without mplayer plugin. Didn't get around to trying
Konqueror (or any combination running e. g. Windows Media Player - or
even MS Internet Explorer - under CrossoverOffice/WINE) or e. g. Opera.
Dormition Sket
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 19:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Can you view video on FoxNews, CNN and BBC on your Suse 10.1 box?
>
> I have 32 bit Firefox on it, and everything I can determine is related to
> it.
>
> What plugins do you have?
I cannot watch any of the videos you posted (bbc, foxt
Dear James,
Can you view video on FoxNews, CNN and BBC on your Suse 10.1 box?
I have 32 bit Firefox on it, and everything I can determine is related to
it.
What plugins do you have?
>Also since he is vascilating: sys-admin on SuSE is very good, on ubuntu is
>OK
>
Yes, I am vascilating. I'v
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 03:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Thanks, guys. I'm going to play around with this a little more before I
> try putting Ubuntu on it, now that I've had some sleep. The posts I've
> seen about getting multimedia working on Suse all have helix and RealPlayer
> installe
Thank you very much. I would greatly appreciate it if you would check these
links out to see if they work for you.
On the FoxNews site, you have to click the Video link at the top right hand
corner of their menu bar. I'm sorry, buy there is not a direct link to it.
http://www.foxnews.com/
Mi
Hi,
Dormition Skete wrote:
> Thanks, guys. I'm going to play around with this a little more before I try
> putting Ubuntu on it, now that I've had some sleep. The posts I've seen
> about getting multimedia working on Suse all have helix and RealPlayer
> installed, so that is worth trying befo
Thanks, guys. I'm going to play around with this a little more before I try
putting Ubuntu on it, now that I've had some sleep. The posts I've seen
about getting multimedia working on Suse all have helix and RealPlayer
installed, so that is worth trying before I scrap this Suse setup. I don't
Hi,
Dormition Skete wrote:
> I think the problem is related to Macromedia Flash. It is not supposed to
> work on 64 bit systems, although there are lots of sites telling how to make
> it work. It gives sound and video for a fraction of a second, and then
> turns black, like it played the whol
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 08:29:55 +0100, Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 64 bit is still a problem for flash. Something I read at slashdot
> implied that new version from macromedia is in works in time for vista
> release and that will be available for Linux too. Active work is going
> on this
On 04/09/06, Dormition Skete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> I can't get the video to work on foxnews, and that is a big thing to my
> boss. He likes to watch the news. Everybody here watches video of one type
> or another, and flash is pretty prevalent, so I need to get this working.
>
> I t
Thanks, everybody. I think I have a decent enough understanding about this
now to know what to do.
I appreciate the help.
Unfortunately, I hit a brick wall, and I have to find a way over, under,
around, or through it before I can actually implement what I want to do with
it.
I can't get the
On Sunday 03 September 2006 01:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >You could just keep it simple and ignore the second nic.
> >
> >You would only need it if you want to route traffic, create another
> >subnet or make it a failover. I think if you assign each nic an ip on
> >the same subnet, that would
Am Freitag, den 01.09.2006, 15:15 -0600 schrieb Dormition Skete:
> I'm trying to set LTSP up on this fancy new server we got, and I'm a bit
> confused about something.
>
> This thing has two on-board gigabit network ports. Obviously, I have to
> assign a separate IP Address for each one (or use D
hope you both have a nice weekend.
With many thanks.
fp
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Configuration help, please.
>Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:20:25 -0500
>
>Sorry to not know personally eno
>You could just keep it simple and ignore the second nic.
>
>You would only need it if you want to route traffic, create another
>subnet or make it a failover. I think if you assign each nic an ip on
>the same subnet, that would cause problems.
>
>bob
Is that why they have two NIC's on them -- for
Sorry to not know personally enough about this, but there is a concept
called Ethernet Bonding, you should Google for it for your particular
server Distribution that you're using. ( I quickly saw Debian, SLES, Gentoo
etc)
The direct answer is NO, it's probably not a good idea to give them
separate
On 9/1/06, Dormition Skete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to set LTSP up on this fancy new server we got, and I'm a bit
> confused about something.
>
> This thing has two on-board gigabit network ports. Obviously, I have to
> assign a separate IP Address for each one (or use DHCP). The s
I'm trying to set LTSP up on this fancy new server we got, and I'm a bit
confused about something.
This thing has two on-board gigabit network ports. Obviously, I have to
assign a separate IP Address for each one (or use DHCP). The server itself
just has one host name, though (right? I mean it
18 matches
Mail list logo
